|Komlos, John (2009): How useful is anthropometric history? Some reflections on Paul Hohenberg’s recent presidential address to the American Economic History Association. Discussion Papers in Economics 2009-6|
In his recent presidential address to the American Economic History Association, Paul Hohenberg argued that anthropometric history does not meet his criteria for useful research in the field of economic history. He considers research useful if (a) it "helps shape one of our underlying disciplines"; b) it contributes "to clear—even fresh—thinking about current, policy-related issues or on-going scholarly debates about the historical past"; and c) it "penetrates the fuzzy realm of identity-shaping popular discourse". I argue briefly that only a superficial reading of the literature would lead to the conclusion that anthropometric history has not been useful.
|Item Type:||Paper (Discussion Paper)|
|Keywords:||Economic History - General; Economic History - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical, Sources and Methods|
Economics > Discussion Papers in Economics
Economics > Discussion Papers in Economics > Economic History
Economics > Chairs > Chair of Economic History
|Subjects:||300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology and anthropology|
300 Social sciences > 330 Economics
|JEL Classification:||N00, N01|
|Deposited On:||21. Apr 2009 09:53|
|Last Modified:||16. Apr 2014 06:09|
Baten, Jörg and John Murray. ‘Heights of Men and Women in Nineteenth Century Bavaria: Economic, Nutritional, and Disease Influences’, Explorations in Economic History, 37 (2000): 351-369.
Behrman, Jere R. and Mark R. Rosenzweig. 2004. Returns to Birthweight. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 2:586-601.
Case, Ann and Christina Paxson. 2008a. Stature and Status: Height, Ability, and Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Political Economy 116, 3:499-532.
Case, Ann and Christina Paxson. 2008b. Height, Health and Cognitive Function at Older Ages. American Economic Review 98, 2:463-467.
Cuff, Timothy. 2005. The Hidden Cost of Economic Development: The Biological Standard of Living in Antebellum Pennsylvania. Aldershot, U.K., Ashgate Publishing.
Deaton, Angus. 2007. Height, health, and development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 33: 13232–13237.
Deaton, Angus. 2008. Height, health, and Inequality: The Distribution of Adult Heights in India. American Economic Review 98, 2: 468-474.
Fogel, Robert W. 1994. Economic Growth, Population Theory, and Physiology: The Bearing of Long-Term Processes on the Making of Economic Policy. American Economic Review 84, 369-395.
Hohenberg, Paul. 2008. Toward a More Useful Economic History. The Journal of Economic History 68, 2:339-354. Komlos, John. 1985. Stature and Nutrition in the Habsburg Monarchy: The Standard of Living and Economic Development. American Historical Review 90: 1149-1161.
Komlos, John. 1989. Nutrition and Economic Development in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy: An Anthropometric History, Princeton University Press.
Komlos, John. 1998. Shrinking in a Growing Economy? The Mystery of Physical Stature during the Industrial Revolution. The Journal of Economic History 58, 3:779-802. Komlos, John. 1987. The Height and Weight of West Point Cadets: Dietary Change in Antebellum America. The Journal of Economic History 47, 897-927.
Komlos, John and Benjamin E. Lauderdale. 2007. Underperformance in Affluence: the Remarkable relative decline in American Heights in the second half of the 20th-Century.” Social Science Quarterly 88, 2:283-304.
Komlos, John in collaboration with Michel Hau and Nicolas Bourguinat. 2003. An Anthropometric History of Early-Modern France, 1666-1766.” European Review of Economic History 7: 159-189.
Krugman, Paul. 2007. America Comes Up Short.” New York Times, June 15. Available at: http://select.nytimes.com/2007/06/15/opinion/15krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Margo, Robert and Richard Steckel. 1983. Heights of Native-Born Whites during the Antebellum Period. The Journal of Economic History 43, 1:167-74.
Nicholas Stephen and Deborah Oxley. 1993. The Living Standards of Women during the Industrial Revolution, 1795-1820. Economic History Review 46, 4:723-49.
Persico, Nicola, Andrew Postlewaite and Dan Silverman. 2004. The Effect of Adolescent Experience on Labor Market Outcomes: The Case of Height. Journal of Political Economy 112: 1019-53.
Schulz, T. Paul. 2002, Wage Gains Associated with Height as a Form of Health Human Capital. American Economic Review 92, 2:349-353.
Schultz, T. Paul. 2003a. Human capital, schooling, and health. Economics and Human Biology 1, 2:207-21.
Schultz, T. Paul. 2003b. Wage rentals for reproducible human capital: evidence from Ghana and the Ivory Coast. Economics and Human Biology 1, 3:331-66.
Steckel, Richard H. 1986. A Peculiar Population: the Nutrition, Health, and Mortality of American Slaves from Childhood to Maturity. The Journal of Economic History 46, 3:721-41.
Steckel, Richard H. 1995. Stature and the Standard of Living. Journal of Economic Literature 33: 1903-40. Steckel, Richard H. 2008. Biological Measures of the Standard of Living.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22, 1:129–152.
Steckel, Richard, H. 2009. Heights and human welfare: Recent developments and new directions. Explorations in Economic History 46:1-23.
Strauss, John and Duncan Thomas. 1998. Health, Nutrition, and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 766-817.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 1993. Press Release. This Year’s Prize Winners are Leading Figures within the Field of ‘New Economic History’. October 12. Available at: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1993/press.html. Accessed July 6, 2008.