
| Wachter, Daniel von (20. September 2005): What Is Possible? Preprint. |
| PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Reader 596Kb |
This paper argues that there are true synthetic modal claims and that modal questions in philosophy are to be interpreted not in terms of logical necessity but in terms of synthetic necessity. I begin by sketching the debate about modality between logical empiricism and phenome-nology. Logical empiricism taught us to equate analyticity and neces-sity. The now common view is that analytic statements are necessary in the narrow sense but that there is also necessity in a wider sense. I argue against this that we should distinguish analyticity and necessity more strictly.
| Item Type: | Paper (Discussion Paper) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | philosophy, metaphysics, modality, possibility, necessity, possible worlds |
| Subjects: | Philosophy Philosophy > Selfarchiving |
| Dewey Classification: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 110 Metaphysics |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-10629-1 |
| Language: | English |
| ID Code: | 10629 |
| Deposited On: | 22. Jun 2009 17:22 |
| Last Modified: | 28. Jun 2010 15:31 |