Factors influencing study engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study among health and social professions students

Koob, Clemens ; Schröpfer, Kristina; Coenen, Michaela ; Kus, Sandra und Schmidt, Nicole (27. Juli 2021): Factors influencing study engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study among health and social professions students.
In: PLoS ONE 16(7), e0255191

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to explore factors influencing the study engagement of health and social professions students during the COVID-19 pandemic. While antecedents of study engagement have been studied previously, the factors influencing engagement under pandemic conditions have not yet been investigated. Furthermore, there is a particular need for research among students in health and social professions programs, as these students are particularly affected by the pandemic. As theoretical basis, the study draws on the demands-resources-theory. It is hypothesized that pandemic-related study and personal resources drive engagement during the pandemic, and that pandemic-related demands negatively influence engagement.

Method: The study uses a cross-sectional survey to explore the hypothesized effects. The sample consists of 559 university students of health and social professions in Germany. The study was carried out in July 2020, towards the end of the first digital semester and after the first peak in COVID-19 cases. Data are analyzed using linear multiple regression analysis.

Results: The findings show that the demands-resources-theory is suitable to explain study engagement even under pandemic conditions. Suitable digital learning formats and social support are identified as important study resources for study engagement during major life events, while emotional resilience, active self-care and academic self-efficacy are identified as important personal resources.

Conclusions: Under pandemic conditions academic institutions should focus on providing beneficial teaching formats and innovative ways to support students lacking social networks. Besides, they should consider developing means to help students structuring daily life as well as establishing initiatives to strengthen students’ self-efficacy beliefs.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Publikationsform: Publisher's Version
• Fakultät: Medizin > Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie ; Medizin > Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie > Lehrstuhl für Public Health und Versorgungsforschung
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• Sprache: Englisch

Literaturliste

1. Robins TG, Roberts RM, Sarris A. Burnout and Engagement in Health Profession Students: The Relationships Between Study Demands, Study Resources and Personal Resources. The Australasian Journal of Organisational Psychology. 2015;8.

2. Edwards D, Burnard P, Bennett K, Hebden U. A longitudinal study of stress and self-esteem in student nurses. Nurse Education Today. 2010;30: 78–84. pmid:19632748

3. Schaufeli WB, Martínez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and Engagement in University Students: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2002;33: 464–481.

4. Bakker AB, Sanz Vergel AI, Kuntze J. Student engagement and performance: A weekly diary study on the role of openness. Motiv Emot. 2015;39: 49–62.

5. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22: 309–328.

6. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel AI. Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD–R Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2014;1: 389–411.

7. Hakanen JJ, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology. 2006;43: 495–513.

8. Bakker AB, Hakanen JJ, Demerouti E, Xanthopoulou D. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2007;99: 274–284.

9. Cilliers JR, Mostert K, Nel JA. Study demands, study resources and the role of personality characteristics in predicting the engagement of fist-year university students. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2018;32: 49–70.

10. Middendorff E, Apolinarski B, Poskowsky J, Kandulla M, Netz N. Die wirtschaftliche und soziale Lage der Studierenden in Deutschland 2012. 20. Sozialerhebung des Deutschen Studentenwerks. 2013.

11. Lesener T, Pleiss LS, Gusy B, Wolter C. The Study Demands-Resources Framework: An Empirical Introduction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17: 5183. pmid:32709128

12. Schaufeli WB. Applying the Job Demands-Resources model: A ‘how to’ guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout. Organizational Dynamics. 2017;46: 120–132.

13. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000;11: 227–268.

14. Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB. The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management. 2007;14: 121–141.

15. Judge TA, Bono JE, Erez A, Locke EA. Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: the role of self-concordance and goal attainment. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90: 257–268. pmid:15769236

16. Luthans F, Youssef CM. Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior. Journal of Management. 2007;33: 321–349.

17. RKI. Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2–7-Tage-Inzidenzen nach Bundesländern und Kreisen (gemäß „Bundesnotbremse“) sowie Gesamtübersicht der pro Tag ans RKI übermittelten Fälle und Todesfälle, Stand: 15.6.2021. [cited 15 Jun 2021]. Available: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Daten/Fallzahlen_Kum_Tab.html

18. Betsch C, Korn L, Felgendreff L, Eitze S, Schmid P, Sprengholz P, et al. German COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO)—Welle 17 (21.07.2020). 2020 [cited 7 Dec 2020].

19. Ketonen EE, Malmberg L-E, Salmela-Aro K, Muukkonen H, Tuominen H, Lonka K. The role of study engagement in university students’ daily experiences: A multilevel test of moderation. Learning and Individual Differences. 2019;69: 196–205.

20. Loscalzo Y, Giannini M. Study Engagement in Italian University Students: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale—Student Version. Soc Indic Res. 2019;142: 845–854.

21. Salmela-Aro K, Read S. Study engagement and burnout profiles among Finnish higher education students. Burnout Research. 2017;7: 21–28.

22. Satow L. SCI—Stress- und Coping-Inventar. Stress and Coping Inventory. 2012 [cited 5 Dec 2020].

23. Wurzer GM. Stress und Coping: Überprüfung der psychometrischen Kennwerte des SCI (Stress-Coping-Inventars) / Gabriele Maria Wurzer. 2016. Available: http://unipub.uni-graz.at/obvugrhs/1327571

24. Blayone T. Reexamining digital-learning readiness in higher education: Positioning digital competencies as key factors and a profile application as a readiness tool. International Journal on E-Learning. 2018;17: 425–451.

25. Händel M, Stephan M, Gläser-Zikuda M, Kopp B, Bedenlier S, Ziegler A. Digital readiness and its effects on higher education students’ socio-emotional perceptions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2020;0: 1–13.

26. Watkins R, Leigh D, Triner D. Assessing Readiness for E-Learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2004;17: 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.2004.tb00321.x

27. Yu T, Richardson JC. An Exploratory Factor Analysis and Reliability Analysis of the Student Online Learning Readiness (SOLR) Instrument. Online Learning. 2015;19.

28. Aristovnik A, Keržič D, Ravšelj D, Tomaževič N, Umek L. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Life of Higher Education Students: A Global Perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12: 8438.

29. Marsh HW. A Longitudinal Perspective of Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Ratings of the Same Teachers over a 13-Year Period. 1992. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED353282

30. Mottet TP, Parker-Raley J, Cunningham C, Beebe SA. The Relationships Between Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy and Student Course Workload and Teacher Availability Expectations. Communication Research Reports. 2005;22: 275–282.

31. Persike M, Friedrich J-D. Lernen mit digitalen Medien aus Studierendenperspektive. Sonderauswertung aus dem CHE Hochschulranking für die deutschen Hochschulen. Themengruppe “Innovationen in Lern- und Prüfungsszenarien” koordiniert vom CHE im Hochschulforum Digitalisierung. Berlin: Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft; 2016.

32. Kocalevent R-D, Mierke A, Brähler E. BRCS—Brief Resilient Coping Scale. In: Kemper C, Brähler E, Zenger M, editors. Psychologische und sozial-wissenschaftliche Kurzskalen. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft; 2014. pp. 43–45.

33. Kocalevent R-D, Zenger M, Hinz A, Klapp B, Brähler E. Resilient coping in the general population: standardization of the brief resilient coping scale (BRCS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2017;15: 251. pmid:29282066

34. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Turner-Bowker D, Gandek B, Maruish ME. SF-36v2 Health Survey: Administration Guide for Clinical Trial Investigators. QualityMetric Inc.; 2008.

35. Al Omari O, Alkhawaldeh A, ALBashtawy M, Qaddumi J, Holm MB, AlOmari D. A Review of the Short Form Health Survey–Version 2. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2019;27: 77–86. pmid:31068492

36. Drixler K, Morfeld M, Glaesmer H, Brähler E, Wirtz MA. Validierung der Messung gesundheitsbezogener Lebensqualität mittels des Short-Form-Health-Survey-12 (SF-12 Version 2.0) in einer deutschen Normstichprobe. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie. 2020;66: 272–286. pmid:32876561

37. Waldhauer J, Kuntz B, Lampert T. Unterschiede in der subjektiven und psychischen Gesundheit und im Gesundheitsverhalten bei 11- bis 17-jährigen Jugendlichen an weiterführenden Schulen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 2018;61: 374–384. pmid:29470591

38. van Grieken RA, Kirkenier AC, Koeter MW, Schene AH. Helpful self-management strategies to cope with enduring depression from the patients’ point of view: a concept map study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14: 331. pmid:25495848

39. Bengel J, Lyssenko L. Resilienz und psychologische Schutzfaktoren im Erwachsenenalter: Stand der Forschung zu psychologischen Schutzfaktoren von Gesundheit im Erwachsenenalter. Köln: BZgA; 2012.

40. Brand T, Fahrenholz M. Methodenbericht. Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt in Deutschland 2020. Bonn: infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft; yp. 70. Available: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/Projekte/Gesellschaftlicher_Zusammenhalt/infas_Methodenbericht_BSt_Zusammenhalt_2020.pdf

41. Betsch C, Korn L, Felgendreff L, Eitze S, Schmid P, Sprengholz P, et al. German COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO)—Welle 9 (28.04.2020). 2020 [cited 7 Dec 2020].

42. Weinstein N, Brown KW, Ryan RM. A multi-method examination of the effects of mindfulness on stress attribution, coping, and emotional well-being. Journal of Research in Personality. 2009;43: 374–385.

43. Binfet J-T, Passmore H-A, Cebry A, Struik K, McKay C. Reducing university students’ stress through a drop-in canine-therapy program. Journal of Mental Health. 2018;27: 197–204. pmid:29265945

44. Arndt C, Ladwig T, Knutzen S. Zwischen Neugier und Verunsicherung: interne Hochschulbefragungen von Studierenden und Lehrenden im virtuellen Sommersemester 2020: Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse. Forschungspapier Institut Technische Bildung und Hochschuldidaktik. 2020 [cited 7 Dec 2020]. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.3090

45. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287: 112934. pmid:32229390

46. Islam MA, Barna SD, Raihan H, Khan MNA, Hossain MT. Depression and anxiety among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: A web-based cross-sectional survey. PLOS ONE. 2020;15: e0238162. pmid:32845928

47. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;63: 539–569. pmid:21838546

48. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Bildung und Kultur. Studierende an Hochschulen. Report No.: Fachserie 11 Reihe 4.1. Available: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/Publikationen/Downloads-Hochschulen/studierende-hochschulen-endg-2110410207004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

49. Taber KS. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48: 1273–1296.

50. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

51. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall; 2010.

52. Elmer T, Mepham K, Stadtfeld C. Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLOS ONE. 2020;15: e0236337. pmid:32702065

53. Hughes MC, Henry BW, Kushnick MR. Teaching During the Pandemic? An Opportunity to Enhance Curriculum. Pedagogy in Health Promotion. 2020;6: 235–238.

54. Rippé CB, Weisfeld-Spolter S, Yurova Y, Kemp A. Pandemic Pedagogy for the New Normal: Fostering Perceived Control During COVID-19. Journal of Marketing Education. 2021; 0273475320987287.

55. Azila-Gbettor EM, Abiemo MK. Moderating effect of perceived lecturer support on academic self-efficacy and study engagement: evidence from a Ghanaian university. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2020;ahead-of-print.

56. Hofmann Y, Müller-Hotop R, Datzer D. Die Bedeutung von Resilienz im Hochschulkontext—Eine Standortbestimmung von Forschung und Praxis. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung. 2020;42: 10–35.

57. Zhang Q, Zhou L, Xia J. Impact of COVID-19 on Emotional Resilience and Learning Management of Middle School Students. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26: e924994-1–e924994-8. pmid:32869770

58. Wouters A, Croiset G, Isik U, Kusurkar RA. Motivation of Dutch high school students from various backgrounds for applying to study medicine: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2017;7: e014779. pmid:28576893

59. Marcinowicz L, Owlasiuk A, Slusarska B, Zarzycka D, Pawlikowska T. Choice and perception of the nursing profession from the perspective of Polish nursing students: a focus group study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16: 243. pmid:27644123

60. Sorokin MY, Kasyanov ED, Rukavishnikov GV, Makarevich OV, Neznanov NG, Lutova NB, et al. Psychological reactions of the population as a factor of adaptation to the COVID-19 pandemic. In: V.M. BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY [Internet]. 9 Jul 2020 [cited 21 Feb 2021] pp. 87–94. https://doi.org/10.31363/2313-7053-2020-2-87-94

61. Chen S, Bonanno GA. Psychological Adjustment During the Global Outbreak of COVID-19: A Resilience Perspective. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2020 [cited 20 Feb 2021]. pmid:32538658

62. Nielsen TH. The Relationship Between Self-Rated Health and Hospital Records. Health Economics. 2016;25: 497–512. pmid:25702929

63. Rautanen P, Soini T, Pietarinen J, Pyhältö K. Primary school students’ perceived social support in relation to study engagement. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2020 [cited 19 Feb 2021].

64. Klassen RM, Klassen JRL. Self-efficacy beliefs of medical students: a critical review. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7: 76–82. pmid:29484552

65. Hofmann Y, Müller-Hotop R, Högl M, Datzer D. Resilienzpotenzial entfalten. Bayerisches Staatsinstitut für Hochschulforschung und Hochschulplanung; 2021 p. 32. Available: https://www.ihf.bayern.de/fileadmin/user_upload/IHF/Projektseiten/REST%40MINT/Resilienzpotenzial_entfalten_ReST%40MINT_01_2021.pdf