|Haeussler, Carolin (2009): The Economics of Knowledge Regulation: An Empirical Analysis of Knowledge Flows. In: R&D Management, Vol. forthc, No. forthc|
Successful innovation depends on the management of a firm’s knowledge base. This paper empirically investigates the determinants of knowledge regulation. Using a unique survey dataset, the analysis suggests that R&D managers do not leak knowledge randomly, but rather regulate knowledge consciously. We find that the source and the channel of knowledge inflows impact knowledge regulation. The findings reveal that the more a firm profits from knowledge inflows from competitors, the fewer actions it takes to regulate outgoing knowledge. We do not find that the extent of knowledge inflows from collaborating firms impacts knowledge regulation. However, the type of channel being used to acquire knowledge matters. Compared to public channels, the different types of private channels used to access knowledge inflow and the type of the competitive relationship influence the firms’ decision to regulate knowledge outflow in the following way: concerning relationships with competitors, firms regulate knowledge outflow more when using formal channels, but less when using informal channels (although a significant difference is not found with the latter); concerning collaborative relationships, firms regulate knowledge outflow less regardless of whether they are using formal or informal private channels compared to using public channels. Presumably firms that acquire knowledge from competing firms through formal private channels compared to public channels, try to establish opaque and soundproof fences to surround them, whereas firms that acquire knowledge from collaborating firms through formal or informal private channels do not want to restrict circulation, but rather facilitate inter-firm knowledge exchange. Our results have important implications for academics and R&D managers alike.
|Keywords:||knowledge management, R&D, biotechnology|
|Collections:||Munich School of Management|
Munich School of Management > Discussion Papers
Munich School of Management > Discussion Papers > Innovation Research
|Subjects:||300 Social sciences > 330 Economics|
|JEL Classification:||O32, L21|
|Deposited On:||26. Jan 2009 09:49|
|Last Modified:||22. May 2012 09:49|
Alcácer, J. and Chung, W. (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53(5), 760-776. Allen, R.C. (1983) Collective invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1-24. Appleyard, M. (1996) How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 137-154. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., and Gambardella, A. (2001) Markets for technology and their implica-tions for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419-451. Arrow, K. (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, in Universi-ties-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (Ed), The rate and direction of inven-tive activity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 609-626. Baldwin, C.Y. and Clark, K.B. (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Science, 52(7), 1116-1127. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., and Lokshin, B. (2004) Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33, 1477-1492. Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (2001) Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198-213. Cassiman, B., Perez-Castrillo, D., and Veugelers, R. (2002) Endogeneizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(6), 775-799. Cassmian, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002) R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evi-dence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. Chesbrough, H. (2003) Open Innovation. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Cockburn, I., Henderson, R., and Stern, S. (1999) Balancing incentives: The tension between basic and applied research, NBER Working Papers 6882. Cockburn, I. and Henderson, R. (1994) Racing to invest? The dynamics if competition in ethi-cal drug discovery. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 3, 481-519. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(3), 569-596. Cohen, W.M., Nelson R.R, and Walsh, J.P. (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: appro-priability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper, No. 7552. Cohen, W.M., Nelson R.R, and Walsh, J.P. (2002) The influence of public research on indus-trial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 15-17. Coombs, J. E. and Hull, R. (1998) 'Knowledge management practices' and path-dependency in innovation. Research Policy, 27, 237-253. Dahl, M.S. and Pedersen, C.O. (2004) Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? Research Policy, 33, 1673-1686. Dahlander, L. and Magnusson, M.G. (2005) Relationships between open source software com-panies and communities: observations from Nordic firms, Research Policy, 34, 481 – 493. David, P.A. (2004) Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 571-589. De Bondt, R. (1996) Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 1-28. De Fraja, G. (1993) Strategic spillovers in patent races. International Journal of Industrial Or-ganization, 11, 139-146. Ekeh, P.P. (1974) Exchange theory. London: Heinemann. Ernst & Young (2005) German biotechnology report. Stuttgart: Ernst & Young. Falk, A. and Fischbacher, U. (2006).A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293-315 Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.M. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quar-terly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868. Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G. and Reidl, A (1993). Does fairness prevent market clearing? An ex-perimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 437-460. Foray, D. (2004). The economics of knowledge Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press. Franke, N. and Shah, S. (2003) How communities support innovative activities. An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32, 157-178. Griliches, Z. (1992) The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-48. Griliches, Z. (1994) Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint. The American Economic Re-view, 84(1), 1-21. Haeussler, C. (2006) When does partnering create market value? A transaction cost and signal-ling theory approach. European Management Journal, 24(1), 1-15. Haeussler, C., Zadmach, H.-M. (2007) Cluster Performance reconsidered: Structure, Linkages and Paths in the German Biotechnology Industry. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59, 261-281. Hagedoorn, J. (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interor-ganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371-385. Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., and von Hippel, E. (2003) Profiting from voluntary information spill-overs: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy, 32, 1753-1769. Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I. (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 63-84. Henkel, J. (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Li-nux. Research Policy, 35, 953-969. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982) Judgement under uncertainty, Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Katsoulacos, Y. and Ulph, D. (1998) Endogeneous spillovers and the performance of research joint ventures. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 333-357. Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining in-novation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131-150. Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 783-820. Levi-Strauss, C. (1969) The elementary structure of kinship. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode. Lhuillery, S. (2006) Voluntary technological disclosure as an efficient knowledge management device: an empirical study. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4/5), 465-491. Liebeskind, J. (1997) Keeping organizational secrets: Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 623-663. Michailova, S. and Hutchings, K. (2006) National cultural influences on knowledge sharing: A comparison of China and Russia. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 383-405. Muntz, G.A. (1909) The relation between science and practice and its bearing on the utility of the institute of metals. Journal of the Institute of Metals, 1, 289-291. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic exchange. Cam-bridge, MA: Harvard University Press. OECD (2005) Statistical definition of biotechnology. Paris. http://www.oecd.org/document/42/0,2340,en_2649_37437_1933994_1_1_1_37437,00.html (accessed on 19 January 2009). Ostrom, E. (1998) A behavioural approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address. American Political Science Association. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1-22. Oxley, J.E. (1999) Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 283-309. Polanyi, H. (1962) Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: Univer-sity of Chicago Press. Rogers, E.M. (1982) Information exchange and technological innovation, in S. Devendra (Ed), The transfer and utilization of technical knowledge. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 105-123. Rosenberg, N. (1990) Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Pol-icy, 19, 165-174. Sally, D. (1995) Conservation and cooperation in social dilemmas. A meta-analysis of experi-ments from 1958-1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92. Saxenian, A. (1996) Regional Advantage: culture and competition in Silicon. Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Schmidt, T. (2005) Knowledge flows and R&D co-operation: Firm-level evidence from Ger-many, ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 05-22. Schrader, S. (1991) Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through informa-tion trading. Research Policy, 20, 253-170. Sentker, A. and Schnabel A. (2008) Der Geistesblitzleiter – Interview mit Hermann Requardt. Die Zeit, 28, June 3, 2008, 36. Spencer, J. W. (2003) Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 217-233. Takahashi, N. (2000) The emergence of generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1105-1134. von Hippel, E. (1987) Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research Pol-icy, 16, 291-302. von Hippel, E. (1994) ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving. Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429-439. von Hippel, E. and von Krogh, G. (2003) Open source software and the private-collective in-novation model: issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14 (2), 209–233. von Krogh, Georg and Roos, J. (1996) Managing knowledge: Perspectives in cooperation and competition. London: Sage. von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., and Lakhani, L.R. (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research Policy, 32, 1217-1241. Zander, U. and Kogut, B. (1995) Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organ-izational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92. Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., and Armstrong, J. (1998) Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65-86.