ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9247-2843; Parvizi, Tandis; Gnörich, Johannes
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1554-7765; Topfstedt, Christof Elias; Buerger, Katharina
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5898-9953; Janowitz, Daniel
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4090-547X; Rauchmann, Boris‐Stephan; Perneczky, Robert
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-7435; Kurz, Carolin; Mehrens, Dirk
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-8935; Kunz, Wolfgang G.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-1952; Kusche‐Palenga, Julia; Kling, Agnes Bernadette; Buchal, Antonia; Nestorova, Elizabet; Silvaieh, Sara; Wurm, Raphael; Traub‐Weidinger, Tatjana; Klotz, Sigrid; Regelsberger, Günther; Rominger, Axel; Drzezga, Alexander; Levin, Johannes
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-4306; Stögmann, Elisabeth; Franzmeier, Nicolai
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9736-2283 und Höglinger, Günter U.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7587-6187
(2024):
Aβ status assessment in a hypothetical scenario prior to treatment with disease‐modifying therapies: Evidence from 10‐year real‐world experience at university memory clinics.
In: Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Vol. 16, No. 4, e70031
[PDF, 586kB]

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
With the advent of disease-modifying therapies, accurate assessment of biomarkers indicating the presence of disease-associated amyloid beta (Aβ) pathology becomes crucial in patients with clinically suspected Alzheimer's disease (AD). We evaluated Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (Aβ CSF) and Aβ levels in positron emission tomography (Aβ PET) biomarkers in a real-world memory-clinic setting to develop an efficient algorithm for clinical use.
METHODS
Patients were evaluated for AD-related Aβ pathology from two independent cohorts (Ludwig Maximilian University [LMU], n = 402, and Medical University of Vienna [MUV], n = 144). Optimal thresholds of CSF biomarkers were deduced from receiver operating characteristic curves and validated against Aβ PET positivity.
RESULTS
In both cohorts, a CSF Aβ42/40 ratio ≥ 7.1% was associated with a low risk of a positive Aβ PET scan (negative predictive value: 94.3%). Implementing two cutoffs revealed 14% to 16% of patients with intermediate results (CSF Aβ42/40 ratio: 5.5%–7.1%), which had a strong benefit from Aβ PET imaging (44%–52% Aβ PET positivity).
DISCUSSION
A two-cutoff approach for CSF Aβ42/40 including Aβ PET imaging at intermediate results provides an effective assessment of Aβ pathology in real-world settings.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Faculties: | Medicine > Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Medicine > Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD) Medicine > Medical Center of the University of Munich > Neurological Clinic and Polyclinic with Friedrich Baur Institute Medicine > Medical Center of the University of Munich > Clinic and Polyclinic for Nuclear Medicine Medicine > Medical Center of the University of Munich > Clinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy |
Subjects: | 600 Technology > 610 Medicine and health |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-123312-1 |
ISSN: | 2352-8729 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 123312 |
Date Deposited: | 27. Dec 2024 07:47 |
Last Modified: | 27. Dec 2024 08:19 |
DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 390857198 |