ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1121-9388
(2025):
The puzzle of scientific disagreement.
In: European Journal for Philosophy of Science, Vol. 15, 35
[PDF, 298kB]
Abstract
Scientists often find themselves in disagreement with their peers, yet continue to hold fast to their views. While Conciliationism, a prominent position in the epistemology of disagreement, condemns such steadfastness as epistemically irrational, philosophers of science often defend it as rationally permissible–indeed, even beneficial for scientific progress. This tension gives rise to what we call the puzzle of scientific disagreement.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) |
| Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 100 Philosophy |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-129030-2 |
| ISSN: | 1879-4912 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 129030 |
| Date Deposited: | 24. Oct 2025 12:10 |
| Last Modified: | 24. Oct 2025 12:10 |
| DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 448424181 |
| DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 455912038 |
