|Glazer, Amihai; Kanniainen, Vesa; Poutvaara, Panu (2008): Firms’ ethics, consumer boycotts, and signalling. CESifo Working Paper, 2323|
This paper develops a theory of consumer boycotts. Some consumers care not only about the products they buy but also about whether the firm behaves ethically. Other consumers do not care about the behavior of the firm but yet may like to give the impression of being ethical consumers. Consequently, to affect a firm’s ethical behavior, moral consumers refuse to buy from an unethical firm. Consumers who do not care about ethical behavior may join the boycott to (falsely) signal that they do care. In the firms’ choice between ethical and unethical behavior, the optimality of mixed and pure strategies depends on the cost of behaving ethically. In particular, when the cost is (relatively) low, ethical behavior arises from a prisoners’ dilemma as the firms’ optimal strategy.
|Item Type:||Paper (Discussion Paper)|
Economics > Chairs > CESifo-Professorship for International Institutional Comparisons
|Subjects:||300 Social sciences > 330 Economics|
|Deposited On:||15. Apr 2014 08:58|
|Last Modified:||29. Apr 2016 09:17|