Abstract
We analyzed urine samples from 191 cats for bacteriuria with an automated urine sediment analyzer (Idexx SediVue Dx), combined with image review by an observer, and compared to bacteriologic culture results. Sixty-nine samples were unambiguously assigned to be free of bacteria by the instrument and the observer, and no bacterial growth was detected. Twenty-seven samples were unambiguously assigned to have bacteriuria;24 of these 27 samples were culture-positive. For these samples, bacteriuria was predicted with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96%. A clear assignment was not possible for 95 samples, 81 of which were culture-negative. Specificity dropped to 45% when all samples were considered. Using the automated leukocyte count to predict bacteriuria, sensitivity was 82% and specificity was 75%. Automated sediment analysis is faster and less observer-dependent than sediment analysis under a microscope, but accurate detection of bacteriuria remains difficult in a large proportion of samples. Bacteriuria was significantly associated with leukocyte count;the leukocyte count was >5/high power field in 82% of culture-positive samples.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Tiermedizin > Zentrum für Klinische Tiermedizin |
Themengebiete: | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit |
ISSN: | 1040-6387 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 100800 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 05. Jun. 2023, 15:35 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 08. Apr. 2024, 14:05 |