Logo Logo
Switch Language to German

Rebeiro, B. M.; Triambak, S.; Garrett, P. E.; Brown, B. A.; Ball, G. C.; Lindsay, R.; Adsley, P.; Bildstein, V.; Burbadge, C.; Diaz-Varela, A.; Faestermann, T.; Hertenberger, R.; Jigmeddorj, B.; Kamil, M.; Leach, K. G.; Mabika, P. Z.; Ondze, J. C. Nzobadila; Orce, J. N.; Radich, A. and Wirth, H.-F. (2021): Spectroscopy of states in Ba-136 using the Ba-138(p, t) reaction. In: Physical Review C, Vol. 104, No. 3, 34309

Full text not available from 'Open Access LMU'.


Background: The Ba-136 isotope is the daughter nucleus in Xe-136 beta beta decay. It also lies in a shape transitional region of the nuclear chart, making it a suitable candidate to test a variety of nuclear models. Purpose: To obtain spectroscopic information on states in Ba-136, which will allow a better understanding of its low-lying structure. These data may prove useful to constrain future Xe-136 -> Ba-136 neutrinoless beta beta decay matrix element calculations. Methods: A Ba-138(p, t) reaction was used to populate states in Ba-136 up to approximately 4.6 MeV in excitation energy. The tritons were detected using a high-resolution Q3D magnetic spectrograph. A distorted wave Born approximation analysis was performed for the measured triton angular distributions. Results: 102 excited states in Ba-136 were observed, out of which 52 are reported for the first time. Definite spin-parity assignments are made for 26 newly observed states, while previously ambiguous assignments for ten other states are resolved. Together with other available data, the results are used to determine level densities in Ba-136. These were compared with theory predictions, obtained using shell model calculations with Hamiltonians previously used for Xe-136 neutrinoless beta beta decay matrix element evaluations. Conclusions: The shell model predicted level densities agree reasonably well for the two Hamiltonians. However the results for theory and experiment are found to agree only at lower energies, diverging from one another for the higher lying states, with the discrepancy increasing with energy. This is presumably because of lower production cross sections for a majority of the higher-lying predicted states and the experimental limitations in resolving a large number of nearly degenerate states predicted by the theory.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item