Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Schildmann, Eva; Meesters, Sophie; Grüne, Bettina; Bolzani, Anna; Habboub, Basel; Hermann, Alina; Remi, Constanze und Bausewein, Claudia (2021): Sedatives and Sedation at the End of Life in Nursing Homes: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study. In: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Bd. 22, Nr. 1: 109-

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Objectives: There is scarce information about sedation in nursing homes at the end of life. We aimed to assess (1) the use of sedatives generally and sedatives with continuous effect, based on objective operational criteria, within the last week of life in nursing homes and (2) factors associated with this treatment. Design: Retrospective cohort study, using the nursing homes' medical records. Setting and Participants: Residents who died in 4 German nursing homes from January 2015 to December 2017 and whose medical records were available (n = 512). Methods: Sedatives analyzed were those recommended by guidelines for palliative sedation: benzodiazepines, levomepromazine, haloperidol (>5 mg/d), and propofol. The definition of sedatives with continuous effect and doses judged as at least moderately sedating were consented by palliative care clinicians and pharmacists, based on the literature. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed (R version 3.6.1). Results: Overall, 110/512 (21%) deceased residents received a sedative at least once during the last week of life, 46/512 (9%) sedatives with continuous effect. Oral lorazepam was used most frequently. Eleven of 512 (2%) residents received doses judged as at least moderately sedating. The term sedation was not used. Most frequent indications were agitation (58/110;53%) and anxiety (35/110;32%);no indication was noted for 36/110 (33%) residents. The resident's involvement in the decision for sedatives was documented in 3/110 (3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed significant associations between use of sedatives and age (OR = 0.94, P < .001) as well as institution (P < .001). Conclusions and Implications: Our data indicate a lower prevalence of sedation compared to international data and considerable differences regarding prevalence between institutions. These differences, potential setting-specific challenges, and need for support measures for consistent best practice of sedation in nursing homes should be further explored. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten