Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Schmoch, Thomas; Bernhard, Michael; Becker-Pennrich, Andrea; Hinske, Ludwig Christian; Briegel, Josef; Moehnle, Patrick; Brenner, Thorsten und Weigand, Markus A. (2021): SEPSIS-3.0 – Ist die Intensivmedizin bereit für die ICD-11? In: Anaesthesist, Bd. 71, Nr. 2: S. 104-109

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Background The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) will come into effect in January 2022. Among other things, The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS-3 definition) will be implemented in it. This defines sepsis as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The aim of the present secondary analysis of a survey on the topic of sepsis-induced coagulopathy was to evaluate whether the SEPSIS-3 definition, 4 years after its international introduction, has arrived in everyday clinical practice of intensive care units (ICU) run by anesthesiologists in Germany and thus the requirements for its use of the ICD-11 are given. Methods Between October 2019 and May 2020, we carried out a nationwide survey among German medical directors of ICUs. In a separate block of questions we asked about the definition of sepsis used in daily practice. In addition, we asked whether the quick-sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score is used in screening for sepsis in the hospital to which to the participating ICU belongs. Results A total of 50 medical directors from anesthesiological ICUs took part in the survey. In total, the ICUs evaluated stated that they had around 14% of the high-care beds registered in Germany. The SEPSIS-3 definition is integrated into everyday clinical practice at 78.9% of the university hospitals and 84.0% of the participating teaching hospitals. In contrast, the qSOFA screening test is only used by 26.3% of the participating university hospitals, but at least 52% of the teaching hospitals and 80% of the other hospitals. Conclusion The data show that both SEPSIS-3 and qSOFA have become part of everyday clinical practice in German hospitals. The cautious use of qSOFA at university hospitals with simultaneous broad acceptance of the SEPSIS-3 definition can be interpreted as an indication that the search for a suitable screening test for sepsis has not yet been completed.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten