Logo Logo
Help
Contact
Switch Language to German

Werdan, Karl; Buerke, Michael; Geppert, Alexander; Thiele, Holger; Zwissler, Bernd and Russ, Martin (2021): Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock-Diagnosis, Monitoring and Therapy. In: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, Vol. 118, No. 6: pp. 88-95

Full text not available from 'Open Access LMU'.

Abstract

Background: The second edition of the German-Austrian S3 guideline contains updated evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients with infarction-related cardiogenic shock (ICS), whose mortality is several times higher than that of patients with a hemodynamically stable myocardial infarction (1). Methods: In five consensus conferences, the experts developed 95 recommendations-including two statements-and seven algorithms with concrete instructions. Results: Recanalization of the coronary vessel whose occlusion led to the infarction is crucial for the survival of patients with ICS. The recommended method of choice is primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with the implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES). If multiple coronary vessels are diseased, only the infarct artery (the culprit lesion) should be stented at first. For cardiovascular pharmacotherapy-primarily with dobutamine and norepinephrine-the recommended hemodynamic target range for mean arterial blood pressure is 65-75 mmHg, with a cardiac index (CI) above 2.2 L/min/m(2). For optimal treatment in intensive care, recommendations are given regarding the type of ventilation (invasive rather than non-invasive, lungprotective), nutrition (no nutritional intake in uncontrolled shock, no glutamine supplementation), thromboembolism prophylaxis (intravenous heparin rather than subcutaneous prophylaxis), und further topics. In case of pump failure, an intra-aortic balloon pump is not recommended;temporary mechanical support systems (Impella pumps, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [VA-ECMO], and others) are hemodynamically more effective, but have not yet been convincingly shown to improve survival. Conclusion: Combined cardiological and intensive-care treatment is crucial for the survival of patients with ICS. Coronary treatment for ICS seems to have little potential for further improvement, while intensive-care methods can still be optimized.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item