Abstract
This review essay critically discusses Robert Talisse's account of democracy and polarization. I argue that Talisse overstates the degree to which polarization arises from the good-faith practice of democratic citizenship and downplays the extent to which polarization is caused by elites and exacerbated by social structures;this leads Talisse to overlook structural approaches to managing polarization and leaves his account of how citizens should respond to polarization incomplete. I conclude that Talisse's insights should nevertheless be integrated into a broader agenda for thinking about the causes and solutions to polarization.
| Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel | 
|---|---|
| Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft | 
| Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie | 
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-106758-4 | 
| ISSN: | 1386-2820 | 
| Sprache: | Englisch | 
| Dokumenten ID: | 106758 | 
| Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 11. Sep. 2023 13:43 | 
| Letzte Änderungen: | 29. Sep. 2023 10:13 | 
| DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 491502892 | 
 
		 
	 
    



