Abstract
This review essay critically discusses Robert Talisse's account of democracy and polarization. I argue that Talisse overstates the degree to which polarization arises from the good-faith practice of democratic citizenship and downplays the extent to which polarization is caused by elites and exacerbated by social structures;this leads Talisse to overlook structural approaches to managing polarization and leaves his account of how citizens should respond to polarization incomplete. I conclude that Talisse's insights should nevertheless be integrated into a broader agenda for thinking about the causes and solutions to polarization.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Faculties: | Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science |
Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 100 Philosophy |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-106758-4 |
ISSN: | 1386-2820 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 106758 |
Date Deposited: | 11. Sep 2023, 13:43 |
Last Modified: | 29. Sep 2023, 10:13 |
DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 491502892 |