Abstract
Differentiation is not only a design feature of European integration, it is also a Member State strategy to overcome preference divergence. However, putting together an optimal group is difficult: Either the resulting club lacks the capacity to produce the club good efficiently;or differentiation attempts lead to an equally suboptimal outcome of a club too large and too heterogeneous to be effective. This paper develops an explanation of this differentiation paradox. When an avant-garde group proposes differentiation, the presence or absence of its go-it-alone power determines the outcome. The former leads to suboptimally large clubs due to the bandwagoning dynamic that produces a cascade. By contrast, the absence of go-it-alone power triggers a blockade and results in suboptimally small clubs. This actor-centred approach to differentiated integration is tested by analysing the establishment of Permanent Structured Co-operation in security and defence, which declined from an ambitious idea into a diluted reality.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Sozialwissenschaften > Geschwister-Scholl-Institut für Politikwissenschaft |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 320 Politik |
ISSN: | 0021-9886 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 106831 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 11. Sep. 2023, 13:44 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 29. Sep. 2023, 17:41 |
DFG: | Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - 491502892 |