Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography

Grosu, Sergio; Wiemker, Rafael; An, Chansik; Obmann, Markus M.; Wong, Eddy; Yee, Judy und Yeh, Benjamin M. (2022): Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography. In: European Radiology, Bd. 32, Nr. 11: S. 7936-7945

Abstract

Objectives To compare the performance of conventional versus spectral-based electronic stool cleansing for iodine-tagged CT colonography (CTC) using a dual-layer spectral detector scanner. Methods We retrospectively evaluated iodine contrast stool-tagged CTC scans of 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 +/- 8 years) undergoing colorectal cancer screening obtained on a dual-layer spectral detector CT scanner. One reader identified locations of electronic cleansing artifacts (n = 229) on conventional and spectral cleansed images. Three additional independent readers evaluated these locations using a conventional cleansing algorithm (Intellispace Portal) and two experimental spectral cleansing algorithms (i.e., fully transparent and translucent tagged stool). For each cleansed image set, readers recorded the severity of over- and under-cleansing artifacts on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none to 4 = severe) and readability compared to uncleansed images. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were used to assess artifact severity, type, and readability (worse, unchanged, or better). Results Compared with conventional cleansing (66% score >= 2), the severity of overall cleansing artifacts was lower in transparent (60% score >= 2, p = 0.011) and translucent (50% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing. Under-cleansing artifact severity was lower in transparent (49% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (39% score >= 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (60% score >= 2). Over-cleansing artifact severity was worse in transparent (17% score >= 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (14% score >= 2, p = 0.023) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (9% score >= 2). Overall readability was significantly improved in transparent (p < 0.001) and translucent (p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing. Conclusions Spectral cleansing provided more robust electronic stool cleansing of iodine-tagged stool at CTC than conventional cleansing.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Medizin
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• ISSN: 0938-7994
• Sprache: Englisch