Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate of High-risk Patients - A Propensity-score-matched-analysis

Westhofen, Thilo; Schott, Melanie; Keller, Patrick; Tamalunas, Alexander; Atzler, Michael; Ebner, Benedikt; Schultheiss, Michael; Damm, Alexander; Kowalski, Christian; Stief, Christian G. und Magistro, Giuseppe (2022): Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate of High-risk Patients - A Propensity-score-matched-analysis. In: Urology, Bd. 159: S. 182-188

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare perioperative management and functional outcome of spinal anesthesia (SpA) to general anesthesia (GA) in high-risk patients treated for lower urinary tract symptoms with Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). METHODS In the current retrospective analysis, a propensity-score-matching of patients treated for lower urinary tract symptom with HoLEP (n = 300) in SpA with ASA>2 (n = 100), GA with ASA>2 (GA-high-risk) (n = 100) or GA with ASA <= 2 (GA-low-risk) (n = 100) was performed. The impact of anesthesiologic mode on perioperative anesthesiologic outcome, early functional outcome and treatment related adverse events (according to Clavien Dindo), was evaluated. RESULTS Hypotensive episodes were significantly less frequent in the SpA-cohort (9%) compared to the GA-high-risk cohort (32%) and the GA low-risk cohort (22%) (each P <.05 respectively). SpA-patients showed a significantly shorter median time in post anesthesia care unit (PACU-time: 135 minutes;120-166.5) compared to GA-high-risk patients (186 minutes;154-189.5), with significant less referrals to Intermediate care unit (1% vs 9 %);(each P <.05). PACU-time (99 minutes) and Intermediate care unit referrals (0%) for GA-low-risk were lower than for both other cohorts. Postoperative requirement for analgesics was significantly lower in the SpA-cohort (2%), compared to both GA-cohorts (74% and 61% respectively;P <.05). No significant difference was found regarding early functional outcome or treatment related adverse events (p-range: 0.201-1.000). CONCLUSION For patients undergoing HoLEP, SpA provides greater hemodynamic stability and allows faster overall postoperative recovery with preferable pain management. Yielding a comparable functional outcome, it is a safe and efficient alternative to GA in high-risk patients. (C) 2022. 2021 Elsevier Inc.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Medizin
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• ISSN: 0090-4295
• Sprache: Englisch