Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Benfor, Bright; Prendes, Carlota F.; Peterss, Sven; Stavroulakis, Konstantinos; Stana, Jan; Pichlmaier, Maximilian und Tsilimparis, Nikolaos (2022): Anatomical analysis of the aortic arch and feasibility study of double and triple branched thoracic endografts in the treatment of isolated arch pathologies. In: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Bd. 62, Nr. 3, ezac246

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients undergoing open arch repair who would be anatomically suitable for multi-branched endovascular arch repair. METHODS: This study was a single-centre review of patients undergoing open arch repair between 2000 and 2020. Anatomical feasibility was determined by comparing arch measurements to the anatomical criteria of the Zenith (R) double and triple inner branched-arch endografts (Cook Medical) and the Relay (R) double arch branched device (Terumo-Aortic). RESULTS: Ninety (90) patients were included in this study, with 43/90 presenting degenerative aneurysm. The distance between the sinotubular junction and the brachiocephalic trunk measured 114 +/- 30 mm on the outer curvature, and the maximum diameter of the proximal landing zone (PLZ) was 41 +/- 11mm. A total of 42/90 patients (47%) were anatomically suitable for at least 1 stent graft and 29/90 patients (32%) were eligible for a triple-branched endograft. The most important determinant factors of anatomical suitability were the PLZ diameter (Cramer's V = 0.743, P < 0.001) and length (Cramer's V = 0.777, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the proportion of patients who may be anatomically suitable for branched-arch repair remains limited. The PLZ dimensions tend to be the most important anatomical limitations and should receive more emphasis in the development of branched-arch devices.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten