Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns

Huflage, Henner; Fieber, Tabea; Farber, Christian; Knarr, Jonas; Veldhoen, Simon; Jordan, Martin C.; Gilbert, Fabian; Bley, Thorsten Alexander; Meffert, Rainer H.; Grunz, Jan-Peter und Schmalzl, Jonas (2022): Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns. In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Bd. 23, Nr. 1, 189

Abstract

Background Morphology and glenoid involvement determine the necessity of surgical management in scapula fractures. While being present in only a small share of patients with shoulder trauma, numerous classification systems have been in use over the years for categorization of scapula fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the established AO/OTA classification in comparison to the classification system of Euler and Ruedi (ER) with regard to interobserver reliability and confidence in clinical practice. Methods Based on CT imaging, 149 patients with scapula fractures were retrospectively categorized by two trauma surgeons and two radiologists using the classification systems of ER and AO/OTA. To measure the interrater reliability, Fleiss kappa (kappa) was calculated independently for both fracture classifications. Rater confidence was stated subjectively on a five-point scale and compared with Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Additionally, we computed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on absolute agreement in a two-way random effects model to assess the diagnostic confidence agreement between observers. Results In scapula fractures involving the glenoid fossa, interrater reliability was substantial (kappa = 0.722;95% confidence interval [CI] 0.676-0.769) for the AO/OTA classification in contrast to moderate agreement (kappa = 0.579;95% CI 0.525-0.634) for the ER classification system. Diagnostic confidence for intra-articular fracture patterns was superior using the AO/OTA classification compared to ER (p < 0.001) with higher confidence agreement (ICC: 0.882 versus 0.831). For extra-articular fractures, ER (kappa = 0.817;95% CI 0.771-0.863) provided better interrater reliability compared to AO/OTA (kappa = 0.734;95% CI 0.692-0.776) with higher diagnostic confidence (p < 0.001) and superior agreement between confidence ratings (ICC: 0.881 versus 0.912). Conclusions The AO/OTA classification is most suitable to categorize intra-articular scapula fractures with glenoid involvement, whereas the classification system of Euler and Ruedi appears to be superior in extra-articular injury patterns with fractures involving only the scapula body, spine, acromion and coracoid process.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Medizin
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• Sprache: Englisch