Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Mücke, Johannes; Reitz, Daniel; Huang, Lili; Silva Mendes, Vanessa da; Landry, Guillaume ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-4068; Reiner, Michael; Belka, Claus ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-7825; Freislederer, Philipp; Corradini, Stefanie ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8709-7252 und Niyazi, Maximilian (2024): Intrafractional motion detection for spine SBRT via X-ray imaging using ExacTrac Dynamic. In: Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology, Bd. 46, 100765 [PDF, 1MB]

Abstract

Purpose: Due to its close vicinity to critical structures, especially the spinal cord, standards for safety for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) should be high. This study was conducted, to evaluate intrafractional motion during spine SBRT for patients without individualized immobilization (e.g., vacuum cushions) using high accuracy patient monitoring via orthogonal X-ray imaging. Methods: Intrafractional X-ray data were collected from 29 patients receiving 79 fractions of spine SBRT. No individualized immobilization devices were used during the treatment. Intrafractional motion was monitored using the ExacTrac Dynamic (ETD) System (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany). Deviations were detected in six degrees of freedom (6 DOF). Tolerances for repositioning were 0.7 mm for translational and 0.5° for rotational deviations. Patients were repositioned when the tolerance levels were exceeded. Results: Out of the 925 pairs of stereoscopic X-ray images examined, 138 (15 %) showed at least one deviation exceeding the predefined tolerance values. In all 6 DOF together, a total of 191 deviations out of tolerance were recorded. The frequency of deviations exceeding the tolerance levels varied among patients but occurred in all but one patient. Deviations out of tolerance could be seen in all 6 DOF. Maximum translational deviations were 2.6 mm, 2.3 mm and 2.8 mm in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical direction. Maximum rotational deviations were 1.8°, 2.6° and 1.6° for pitch, roll and yaw, respectively. Translational deviations were more frequent than rotational ones, and frequency and magnitude of deviations showed an inverse correlation. Conclusion: Intrafractional motion detection and patient repositioning during spine SBRT using X-ray imaging via the ETD System can lead to improved safety during the application of high BED in critical locations. When using intrafractional imaging with low thresholds for re-positioning individualized immobilization devices (e.g. vacuum cushions) may be omitted.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten