Abstract
Online labor platforms use algorithmic management systems and algorithmic control to automate management tasks traditionally performed by humans. However, these platforms face a control-performance dilemma: while granting workers control over tasks increases satisfaction, lacking algorithmic control of workers’ behavior impedes the system’s performance. Although workers’ reactions to algorithmic control, such as using workarounds or leaving the platform, are well understood, the underlying causes remain unclear. Addressing this shortcoming, we tested our proposed research model using survey data. We apply agency theory to examine how transparency and value impact workaround use and continuance intention. Our study reveals that transparency reduces workaround use while its impact is moderated by value, which also increases continuance intention. However, we could not confirm a significant relationship between workaround use and continuance intention. We address this by introducing the concepts of benevolent and malevolentworkarounds, prompting further discussion on workarounds in the context of algorithmic management.
Dokumententyp: | Konferenzbeitrag (Paper) |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Betriebswirtschaft > Institut für Digitales Management und Neue Medien > Process and Algorithmic Management |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 123798 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 29. Jan. 2025 15:45 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 29. Jan. 2025 15:45 |