ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6630-6406; Neidlein, Claas; Schroeder, Lennart
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3966-2637; Watrinet, Julius; Pätzold, Robert; Böcker, Wolfgang
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0554-0201; Holzapfel, Boris Michael; Fürmetz, Julian
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5529-1632 und Bormann, Markus
(2. August 2024):
Lack of standardisation in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures: a multicentre experience.
In: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Bd. 50: S. 2937-2945
[PDF, 1MB]

Abstract
Objective
In recent years, the trauma mechanisms and fracture types in tibial plateau fractures (TPF) have changed. At the same time, treatment strategies have expanded with the establishment of new classification systems, extension of diagnostics and surgical strategies. Evidence-based recommendations for treatment strategies are rare. The aim of this study is to assess the extent of standardization in the treatment of complex TPF.
Material and methods
For the study, specialists in trauma surgery/orthopaedics were presented thin-slice CT data sets of three complex TPFs including 3D reconstructions. A standardized questionnaire on fracture morphology and planned treatment strategy was then completed.
Results
A total of 23 surgeons from 7 hospitals (Trauma center levels I–III) were included.
All three fractures were most frequently classified as Schatzker type V (fracture I: 52.2%, II: 56.5%, III: 60%). Averaged over all three fractures, 55% of the respondents chose the same patient positioning. The combination of a posteromedial and anterolateral approach was the most frequently chosen approach at 42.7%. Double plating was favored for the surgical treatment of all fractures (70.7%). Preoperative MRI, extended approaches and intraoperative fraturoscopy were significantly more common in level I trauma centres.
Conclusion
There are major differences in the management of complex TPF. 360° treatment is carried out in all departments regardless of the level of care, but without further standardization in terms of preoperative imaging, classification, initial treatment, approach, fixation and intraoperative imaging. There are major differences within the departments with different level of care.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Medizin > Klinikum der LMU München > MUM - Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München |
Themengebiete: | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-126197-3 |
ISSN: | 1863-9933 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 126197 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 26. Mai 2025 16:56 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 26. Mai 2025 16:56 |