Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Weiss, Lena ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8101-3529; Stintzing, Sebastian ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3297-5801; Stahler, Arndt ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1041-0137; Westphalen, C. Benedikt ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-3754; Fischer von Weikersthal, Ludwig; Decker, Thomas; Kiani, Alexander ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2494-4087; Vehling-Kaiser, Ursula; Al-Batran, Salah-Edin; Heintges, Tobias; Lerchenmüller, Christian A.; Kahl, Christoph; Seipelt, Gernot; Kullmann, Frank; Heinrich, Kathrin ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3580-2313; Holch, Julian Walter ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4755-0179; Alig, Annabel ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-3450; Jung, Andreas ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5270-9108; Modest, Dominik Paul und Heinemann, Volker ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-3321 (15. Mai 2025): Molecular hyperselection for optimal choice of first-line targeted therapy independent of primary tumor sidedness: An exploratory analysis of the randomized FIRE-3 study performed in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. In: European Journal of Cancer, Bd. 221, 115399 [PDF, 1MB]

Abstract

Introduction

Molecular diagnostics play a pivotal role in guiding therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Current guidelines recommend stratification based on biomarkers such as RAS, BRAF, and DNA mismatch-repair (MMR) status to select between anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) and anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapies.

Materials and methods

This retrospective analysis evaluated the randomized FIRE-3 study that compared first-line treatment with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in RAS wild-type patients. The present analysis included 199 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type MMR proficient tumors. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was successfully performed in all patients and allowed stratification into hyperselected (no predefined genetic alterations) or gene altered subgroups using the previously published approach of the PRESSING-studies.

Results

Hyperselection according to PRESSING-3 was associated with a survival benefit from anti-EGFR-based therapy compared to bevacizumab (38.5 months vs. 27.5 months; HR 0.68; 95 % CI, 0.44–1.05; P = 0.08). This benefit was observed in both, right- and left-sided tumors, (HR 0.58 and HR 0.70). Patients with gene alterations showed inferior survival compared to hyperselected patients across all subgroups. In this unfavorable subgroup, application of cetuximab and bevacizumab were associated with comparable OS (total cohort: HR 1.04; 95 % CI, 0.61–1.79). Again, this finding was independent of primary tumor sidedness (left-sided tumors: HR 1.10; 95 % CI, 0.59–2.07; right-sided tumors: HR 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.31–3.55).

Conclusion

Molecular hyperselection facilitated by next generation sequencing could replace primary tumor sidedness as a tool of decision making for optimal choice of targeted therapy in first-line treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten