Abstract
A widespread method for now- and forecasting economic macro level parameters such as GDP growth rates are survey-based indicators which contain early information in contrast to official data. But surveys are commonly affected by nonresponding units which can produce biases if these missing values can not be regarded as missing at random. As many papers examined the effect of nonresponse in individual or household surveys, only less is known in the case of business surveys. So, literature leaves a gap on this issue. For this reason, we analyse and impute the missing observations in the Ifo Business Survey, a large business survey in Germany. The most prominent result of this survey is the Ifo Business Climate Index, a leading indicator for the German business cycle. To reflect the underlying latent data generating process, we compare different imputation approaches for longitudinal data. After this, the microdata are aggregated and the results are compared with the original indicators to evaluate their implications on the macro level. Finally, we show that the bias is minimal and ignorable.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Submitted Version |
Keywords: | Business survey, Longitudinal data, Imputation, Nonresponse |
Fakultät: | Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik > Statistik > Technische Reports |
Themengebiete: | 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 510 Mathematik |
JEL Classification: | C81, C83 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-12722-4 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 12722 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 13. Feb. 2012, 14:45 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 12:53 |