Abstract
Many high technology goods are based on standards that require several essential patents owned by different IP holders. This gives rise to a complements and a double mark-up problem. We compare the welfare effects of two different business strategies dealing with these problems. Vertical integration of an IP holder and a downstream producer solves the double mark-up problem between these firms. Nevertheless, it may raise royalty rates and reduce output as compared to non-integration. Horizontal integration of IP holders solves the complements problem but not the double mark-up problem. Vertical integration discourages entry and reduces innovation incentives, while horizontal integration always benefits from entry and innovation
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Sonderforschungsbereiche > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems
Sonderforschungsbereiche > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems > A4 - Unvollständige Verträge, Marktinteraktion und soziale Vergleichsprozesse Volkswirtschaft Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Seminar für Wirtschaftstheorie |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | L1, L4 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-13279-2 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 13279 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 10. Jul. 2012, 13:07 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 12:53 |
Alle Versionen dieses Dokumentes
-
Complementary Patents and Market Structure. (deposited 10. Jul. 2012, 13:08)
- Complementary Patents and Market Structure. (deposited 10. Jul. 2012, 13:07) [momentan angezeigt]