
Abstract
Lobbyists choose what to lobby for. If they can precommit to certain policy proposals, their choice will have an influence on the behavior of opposing lobbyists. Hence lobbyists have an incentive to moderate their policy proposals in order to reduce the intensity of the lobbying contest. This logic has been explored in a number of recent papers. I reconsider the topic with a perfectly discriminating contest. With endogenous policy proposals, there is a subgame perfect equilibrium where the proposals of the lobbyists coincide and maximize joint welfare; moreover, this equilibrium is the only one that survives repeated elimination of dominated strategies. Hence there is no rent dissipation at all. A politician trying to maximize lobbying expenditures would prefer an imperfectly discriminating contest.
Item Type: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | Interest groups; Endogenous lobbying targets, Voluntary restraint; Polarization |
Faculties: | Special Research Fields > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems Special Research Fields > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems > A2 - Konflikte in Organisations- und Steuerungsproblemen |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
JEL Classification: | D72 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-13507-5 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 13507 |
Date Deposited: | 10. Jul 2012, 13:11 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 12:53 |