Abstract
This paper develops a competition theory framework that evaluates an important aspect of the OECD’s Harmful Tax Practices Initiative against tax havens. We show that the sequential nature of the process is harmful and more costly than a “big bang” multilateral agreement. The sequentiality may even prevent the process from being completed successfully. Closing down a subset of tax havens reduces competition among the havens that remain active. This makes their “tax haven business” more profitable and shifts a larger share of rents to these remaining tax havens, making them more reluctant to give up their “tax haven business”. Moreover, the outcome of this process, reducing the number of tax havens, but not eliminating them altogether, may reduce welfare in the OECD.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Keywords: | tax haven, harmful tax practices, bidding for haven inactivation |
Faculties: | Economics Economics > Chairs > MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-13964-9 |
ISSN: | 0022-1996 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 13964 |
Date Deposited: | 03. Sep 2012 09:30 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020 12:54 |