Abstract
We analyze whether incentives from relative performance pay are reduced or enhanced if a department is possibly terminated due to a crisis. Our benchmark model shows that incentives decrease in a severe crisis, but are boosted given a minor crisis since efforts are strategic complements in the former case but strategic substitutes in the latter one. We tested our predictions in a laboratory experiment. The results confirm the effort ranking but show that in a severe crisis individuals deviate from equilibrium significantly stronger than in other situations. This behavior contradicts the benchmark model and leads to a five times higher survival probability of the department. We develop a new theoretical approach that may explain players’ behavior.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Preprint |
Keywords: | crisis; incentives; strategic complements; strategic substitutes; tournament |
Fakultät: | Sonderforschungsbereiche > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems
Sonderforschungsbereiche > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems > B4 - Die Gestaltung von Turnieren im Rahmen der Corporate Governance |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | C9, J3, J6, M5 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-17290-5 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 17290 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 21. Okt. 2013, 09:23 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 12:59 |