Abstract
We analyze whether incentives from relative performance pay are reduced or enhanced if a department is possibly terminated due to a crisis. Our benchmark model shows that incentives decrease in a severe crisis, but are boosted given a minor crisis since efforts are strategic complements in the former case but strategic substitutes in the latter one. We tested our predictions in a laboratory experiment. The results confirm the effort ranking but show that in a severe crisis individuals deviate from equilibrium significantly stronger than in other situations. This behavior contradicts the benchmark model and leads to a five times higher survival probability of the department. We develop a new theoretical approach that may explain players’ behavior.
| Item Type: | Paper |
|---|---|
| Form of publication: | Preprint |
| Keywords: | crisis; incentives; strategic complements; strategic substitutes; tournament |
| Faculties: | Special Research Fields > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems Special Research Fields > Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems > B4 - Die Gestaltung von Turnieren im Rahmen der Corporate Governance |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
| JEL Classification: | C9, J3, J6, M5 |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-17290-5 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 17290 |
| Date Deposited: | 21. Oct 2013 09:23 |
| Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020 12:59 |

