Abstract
The subjective Everettian approach to quantum mechanics presented by Deutsch and Wallace fails to constitute an empirically viable theory of quantum phenomena. The decision theoretic implementation of the Born rule realized in this approach provides no basis for rejecting Everettian quantum mechanics in the face of empirical data that contradicts the Born rule. The approach of Greaves and Myrvold, which provides a subjective implementation of the Born rule as well but derives it from empirical data rather than decision theoretic arguments, avoids the problem faced by Deutsch and Wallace and is empirically viable. However, there is good reason to cast doubts on its scientific value.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | Everett interpretation quantum mechanics |
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP)
Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Philosophy of Physics |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 17431 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 08. Nov. 2013 11:12 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 29. Apr. 2016 09:14 |