|Thoma, Carmen (19. November 2013): Is Underconfidence Favored over Overconfidence? An Experiment on the Perception of a Biased Self-Assessment. Discussion Papers in Economics 2013-17|
This paper reports findings of a laboratory experiment, which explores how elfassessment regarding the own relative performance is perceived by others. In particular, I investigate whether overconfident subjects or underconfident subjects are considered as more likable by others, and who of the two is expected to achieve a higher performance in a real effort task. I observe that underconfidence beats overconfidence in both respects. Underconfident subjects are rewarded significantly more often than overconfident subjects, and are significantly more often expected to win the competitive real-effort task. It seems as if subjects being less convinced of their performance are taken as more congenial and are expected to be more ambitious to improve, whereas overconfident subjects are rather expected to rest on their high beliefs. While subjects do not anticipate the stronger performance signal of underconfidence, they anticipate its higher sympathy value. The comparison to a non-strategic setting shows that men strategically deflate their self-assessment to be rewarded by others. Women, in contrast, either do not deflate their self-assessment or do so even in non-strategic situations, a behavior that might be driven by nonmonetary image concerns of women.
|Item Type:||Paper (Discussion Paper)|
|Keywords:||Self-confidence, Overconfidence, Experiment|
Economics > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics
|Subjects:||300 Social sciences > 330 Economics|
|JEL Classification:||C91, D03, J16|
|Deposited On:||20. Nov 2013 13:02|
|Last Modified:||02. May 2016 07:06|
Akerlof, G. A., Dickens, W. T., 1982. Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4), 543-569.
Alicke, M. D., 1985. Global Self-Evaluation as Determined by the Desirability and Controllability of Trait Adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621-1630.
Balafoutas, L., Sutter, M., 2012. Affirmative Action Policies Promote Women and Do Not Harm Efficiency in the Lab. Science, 335(6068), 579-582.
Bénabou, R., Tirole, J., 2002. Self Confidence and Personal Motivation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 871-915.
Benoît, J.-P., Dubra, J., 2011. Apparent Overconfidence. Econometrica, 79(5) , 1591- 1625.
Beyer, S., 1990. Gender Differences in the Accuracy of Self-Evaluations of Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 960-970.
Beyer, S., Bowden, E. M., 1997. Gender Differences in Self-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias. Personality and Social Psy- chology Bulletin, 23, 157-172.
Brocas, I., Carrillo, J. D., 2000. The Value of Information when Preferences are Dynamically Inconsistent. European Economic Review, 44, 1104-1115.
Brody, L. R., 1997. Gender and Emotion: Beyond Stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 369-394.
Brunnermeier, M. K., Parker, J. A., 2005. Optimal Expectations. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1092-1118.
Burks, S. V., Carpenter, J. P., Goette, L., Rustichini, A., 2013. Overconfidence and Social Signalling. Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming.
Camerer, C., Lovallo, D., 1999. Overconfidence and Excess Entry: An Experimental Approach. American Economic Review, 89(1), 306-318.
Caplin, A., Leahy, J., 2001. Psychological Expected Utility Theory and Anticipatory Feelings. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 55-79.
Charness, G., Rustichini, A., Van de Ven, J., 2012. Self-Confidence and Strategic Behavior. Mimeo.
Clark, J., Friesen, L., 2009. Overconfidence in Forecasts of Own Performance: An Experimental Study. Economic Journal, 119(534), 229-251.
Compte, O., Postlewaite, A., 2004. Confidence-Enhanced Performance. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1536-1557.
Datta Gupta, N., Poulsen, A., Villeval, M. C., 2013. Gender Matching and Competitiveness: Experimental Evidence. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 816-835.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., 2011. Performance Pay and Multi-Dimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences and Gender. American Economic Review, 101(2), 556-590.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., Wagner, G., 2011. Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522-550.
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., Holzberg, A. D., 1989. Ambiguity and Self-Evaluation: The Role of Idiosyncratic Trait Definitions in Self-Serving Assessments of Ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1082-1090.
Eagly, A. H., 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ewers, M., Zimmermann, F., 2012. Image and Misreporting. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6425.
Fischbacher, U., 2007. z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171-178.
Gervais S., Goldstein, I., 2007. The Positive Effects of Biased Self-Perceptions in Firms. Review of Finance, 11(3), 453-496.
Greiner, B., 2004. An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003, GWDG Bericht 63, Eds. K. Kremer and V. Macho, Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen, 79-93.
Grossman, M., Wood, W., 1993. Gender Differences in Intensity of Emotional Experience: A Social Role Interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1010-1022.
Hoelzl, E., Rustichini, A., 2005. Overconfident: Do You Put Your Money on It? Eco- nomic Journal, 115, 305-318.
Koszegi, B., 2006. Ego Utility, Overconfidence, and Task Choice. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(4), 673-707.
Krueger, J. I., 1999. Lake Wobegon be Gone! The “Below-Average Effect" and the Egocentric Nature of Comparative Ability Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 221-232.
Larrick, R. P., Burson, K. A., Soll, J. B., 2007. Social Comparison and Confidence: When Thinking You're Better than Average Predicts Overconfidence (and when it Does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 76-94.
Ludwig, S., Thoma, C., 2012. Do Women Have More Shame than Men? An Experiment on Self-Assessment and the Shame of Overestimating Oneself. Munich Discussion Paper 2012-15.
Malmendier, U., Tate, G., 2005. CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661-2700.
Malmendier, U., Tate, G., 2008. Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the Market's Reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89, 20-43.
Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P., Samuelson, C. D., 1985. Why We Are Fairer than Others? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480-500.
Montinari N., Nicolo, A., Oexl, R., 2012. Mediocrity and Induced Reciprocity. Jena Economic Research Papers 2012-053.
Moore, D. A., Cain, D. M., 2007. Overconfidence and Underconfidence: When and Why People Underestimate (and Overestimate) the Competition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 197-213.
Moore, D., Healy, P. J., 2008. The Trouble with Overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502-517.
Möbius, M. M., Niederle, M., Niehaus, P., Rosenblat, T. S., 2012. Managing Self- Confidence: Theory and Experimental Evidence. Mimeo.
Myerson, R. (1991), Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press: Cambridge,MA.
Niederle, M., Segal, C., Vesterlund, L., 2013. How Costly Is Diversity? Affirmative Action in Light of Gender Differences in Competitiveness. Management Science, 59(1), 1-16.
Niederle, M., Vesterlund, L., 2007. Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete too Much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (3), 1067-1101.
Niederle, M., Yestrumskas, A. H., 2008. Gender Differences in Seeking Challenges: The Role of Institutions. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3922. Odean, T., 1999. Do Investors Trade too Much? American Economic Review, 89, 1279-1298.
Raven, J. C., 2000. Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM). Pearson. Reuben, E., Rey-Biel, P., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., 2012. The Emergence of Male Leadership in Competitive Environments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Or- ganization, 83(1), 111-117.
Rudman, L. A., 1998. Self-Promotion as a Risk-Factor for Women: The Costs and Benefits of Counterstereotypical Impression Management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 629-645.
Samuelson, L., 2001. Analogies, Adaptation, and Anomalies. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2), 320-366.
Santos-Pinto, L., 2008. Positive Self-image and Incentives in Organisations. Economic Journal, 118(531), 1315-1332.
Sautmann, A., 2013. Contracts for Agents with Biased Beliefs: Some Theory and an Experiment. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, forthcoming.
Svenson, O., 1981. Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful than our Fellow Drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47, 143-148.