Abstract
We analyze an experimental public goods game in which group members can endogenously determine whether they want to supplement a standard voluntary contribution mechanism with the possibility of rewarding or punishing other group members. We find a large and positive effect of endogenous institutional choice on the level of cooperation in comparison to exogenously implemented institutions. This suggests that participation rights enhance cooperation in groups. With endogenous choice, groups typically vote for the reward option, even though punishment is actually more effective in sustaining high levels of cooperation. Our results are evaluated against the predictions of social preference models.
Item Type: | Paper |
---|---|
Faculties: | Economics Economics > Chairs > Chair of Empirical Economics |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
JEL Classification: | C72, C91, C92 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-18188-9 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 18188 |
Date Deposited: | 06. Feb 2014, 15:28 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 12:59 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations. (deposited 06. Feb 2014, 15:28) [Currently Displayed]