Abstract
Renormalization group (RG) methods are an established strategy to explain how it is possible that microscopically different systems exhibit virtually the same macro behavior when undergoing phase-transitions. I argue – in agreement with Robert Batterman – that RG explanations are non-causal explanations. However, Batterman misidentifies the reason why RG explanations are non-causal: it is not the case that an explanation is non- causal if it ignores causal details. I propose an alternative argument, according to which RG explanations are non-causal explanations because their explanatory power is due to the application mathematical operations, which do not serve the purpose of representing causal relations.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | Scientific explanation, Multiple realization, Universality, Renormalization group explanation, Statistical physics |
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP)
Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Philosophy of Science |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-18403-4 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 18403 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 02. Mrz. 2014 10:24 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020 12:59 |