Abstract
In Meyer’s promising account [7] deontic logic is reduced to a dynamic logic. Meyer claims that with his account “we get rid of most (if not all) of the nasty paradoxes that have plagued traditional deontic logic.” But as was shown by van der Meyden in [4], Meyer’s logic also contains a paradoxical formula. In this paper we will show that another paradox can be proven, one which also effects Meyer’s “solution” to contrary to duty obligations and his logic in general.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | dynamic deontic logic; PDeL; Chisholm’s paradox; contrary to duty obligations |
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP)
Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Logic |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie
100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 160 Logik |
ISSN: | 0039-3215 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 19047 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 28. Mai 2014, 06:28 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 13:00 |