Abstract
This paper analyzes the intertemporal allocation effects of anticipated tax rate changes, reconsidering the recommendations of the Meade Committee in a perfect foresight general equilibrium model of economic growth. It is shown that the R-base (or consumption) tax can be more distortionary than an income tax and that a revenue-neutral integration of corporate and personal taxation will lower social welfare. Moreover, it is argued that a dividend tax dominates the R-base tax because it places its distortions on the financial, rather than on the real, side of the economy. Copyright 1989 by American Economic Association.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Lehrstuhl für Nationalökonomie |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 19370 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 15. Apr. 2014, 08:50 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 29. Apr. 2016, 09:16 |