Abstract
This paper analyzes the intertemporal allocation effects of anticipated tax rate changes, reconsidering the recommendations of the Meade Committee in a perfect foresight general equilibrium model of economic growth. It is shown that the R-base (or consumption) tax can be more distortionary than an income tax and that a revenue-neutral integration of corporate and personal taxation will lower social welfare. Moreover, it is argued that a dividend tax dominates the R-base tax because it places its distortions on the financial, rather than on the real, side of the economy. Copyright 1989 by American Economic Association.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Economics Economics > Chairs > Chair for Public Economics |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 19370 |
| Date Deposited: | 15. Apr 2014 08:50 |
| Last Modified: | 29. Apr 2016 09:16 |
