ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5011-0828
(2013):
Loss Aversion and Ex Post Inefficient Renegotiation.
Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2013: Wettbewerbspolitik und Regulierung in einer globalen Wirtschaftsordnung - Session: Contracts: Theory and Experiments A05-V1
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
We propose a theory of ex post inefficient renegotiation that is based on loss aversion. When two parties write a long-term contract that has to be renegotiated after the realization of the state of the world, they take the initial contract as a reference point to which they compare gains and losses of the renegotiated transaction. We show that loss aversion makes the renegotiated outcome sticky and materially inefficient. The theory has important implications for the optimal design of long-term contracts. First, it explains why parties often abstain from writing a beneficial long-term contract or why some contracts specify transactions that are never ex post efficient. Second, it shows under what conditions parties should rely on the allocation of ownership rights to protect relationship-specific investments rather than writing a specific performance contract. Third, it shows that employment contracts can be strictly optimal even if parties are free to renegotiate.
| Item Type: | Paper |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Economics > Chairs > Seminar for Economic Theory Economics > Chairs > Junior Professor in Microeconomics (closed) |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 19447 |
| Date Deposited: | 15. Apr 2014 08:51 |
| Last Modified: | 24. Oct 2019 09:40 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Loss aversion and ex post inefficient renegotiation. (deposited 15. Apr 2014 08:51)
- Loss Aversion and Ex Post Inefficient Renegotiation. (deposited 15. Apr 2014 08:51) [Currently Displayed]
