Abstract
A widely recognized article by Smith suggests that harvesting leading to species extinction may be socially optimal, provided that the species growth-potential is sufficiently low. It is shown that this conclusion hinges on special assumptions about harvest technology which, despite a superficial compatibility with neoclassical production theory, contradict a basic postulate of a pioneering article by Gordon. As soon as Gordon’s postulate is taken into account, while all other aspects of Smith’s model are maintained, it turns out that even a species with a very low growth potential should not become extinct.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Lehrstuhl für Nationalökonomie |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 19907 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 15. Apr. 2014, 08:54 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 29. Apr. 2016, 09:17 |