This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
This paper characterizes analytically the optimal tariff of a large one-sector economy with monopolistic competition and firm heterogeneity in general equilibrium, thereby extending the small-country results of Demidova and Rodríguez-Clare (JIE, 2009) and the homogeneous firms framework of Gros (JIE, 1987). The optimal tariff internalizes a mark-up distortion, an entry distortion, and a terms-of-trade externality. It is larger when the dispersion of firm-level productivities is higher, and the country’s relative size or relative average productivity is bigger. Furthermore, in the two-country Nash equilibrium, tariffs turn out to be strategic substitutes. Small or poor economies set lower Nash tariffs than large or rich ones. Lower transportation costs or smaller fixed market entry costs induce higher equilibrium tariffs and larger welfare losses relative to the case of zero tariffs. Similarly, cross-country productivity or size convergence, and higher firm-level productivity dispersion increase the global welfare loss due to non-cooperative tariff policies. These results suggest that post WWII trends have increased the relative merits of the WTO.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Economics Economics > Chairs > CESifo-Professorship for International Trade |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 20591 |
| Date Deposited: | 15. Apr 2014 09:00 |
| Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020 13:01 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Optimal tariffs, retaliation and the welfare loss from tariff wars in the Melitz model. (deposited 15. Apr 2014 09:00)
- Optimal tariffs, retaliation, and the welfare loss from tariff wars in the Melitz model. (deposited 15. Apr 2014 09:00) [Currently Displayed]
