Abstract
This paper studies the innovation strategies of multi-product firms in industries with different scope for product differentiation. In a simple model of multi-product firms, we show that returns to product versus process innovation are industry-specific. Demand and cost linkages induce a natural distinction between the returns to product and process innovation. In highly differentiated industries, the cannibalization effect is lower and, therefore, firms invest more in product innovation. In homogeneous industries, firms internalize intra-firm spillover effects and invest more in process innovation. We test the predictions from the model using Brazilian firm-level data, with information on investment efforts over time. Following a major exchange rate devaluation, firms have better access to foreign markets and exploit economies of scale in innovation. However, detailed information on product and process innovation allows us to evaluate differential effects across industries. We con.rm the predictions from the theoretical model and show that the type of innovation depends on the industry scope for differentiation.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | Multi-Product Firms, Innovation, Product Differentiation, Cannibalization Effect, Spillovers, Globalization |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics
Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Seminar für Außenwirtschaftstheorie |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | F12, F14, L25 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-21022-6 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 21022 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 25. Jun. 2014, 13:32 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 08. Nov. 2020, 11:17 |
Literaturliste: | [1] Almeida, R. and Poole, J.P. (2013) "Trade and Labor Reallocation with Heterogeneous Enforcement of Labor Regulations". IZA Discussion Papers 7358. [2] Arkolakis, C. and Muendler, M.A. (2010) "The Extensive Margin of Exporting Products: A Firm-level Analysis". NBER Working Papers, 16641. [3] Aw, B. Y., Roberts M. J. and Xu D. Y. (2011) "R&D Investment, Exporting, and Productivity Dynamics". American Economic Review, 101(4): 1312-44. [4] Bernard, A., Jensen, B., Redding, S. and Schott P. (2007) "Firms in International Trade". Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 105-130. [5] Bernard, A., Redding, S. and Schott P. (2010) "Multiple-Product Firms and Product Switching". American Economic Review, 100(1), 70-97. [6] Broda, C. and Weinstein, D. E. (2010) "Product Creation and Destruction: Evidence and Price Implications". American Economic Review, 100(3), 691-723. [7] Bustos, P. (2011) "Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms". American Economic Review, 101, 304-340. [8] Dhingra, S. (2013) "Trading Away Wide Brands for Cheap Brands". American Economic Review, 103(6), 2554-84. [9] Doraszelski, U. and Jaumandreu, J. (2013) "Estimating Endogenous Productivity". Review of Economic Studies; 80, 1338-1383. [10] Eckel, C., Iacovone, L., Javorcik, B. and Neary, J.P. (2011) "Multi-Product Firms at Home and Away: Cost- versus Quality-based Competence". CEPR Discussion Papers 8186. [11] Eckel, C. and Neary, P.J. (2010) "Multi-product Firms and Flexible Manufacturing in the Global Economy". Review of Economic Studies, 77 , 188-217. [12] Feenstra, R. C., Lipsey, R. E., Deng, H., Ma, A. C. and Mo, H. (2005): "World Trade Flows: 1962-2000". NBER Working Paper No. 11040. [13] Feenstra, R. and Ma H. (2008) "Optimal Choice of Product Scope for Multiproduct Firms under Monopolistic Competition", In: Helpman E., Marin D., and Verdier T.(Eds.), The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press, 173-199. [14] Goldberg, L. S. (2004) "Industry-specific Exchange Rates for the United States". Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 1-16. [15] Grossman, G. M. and Helpman E. (1991) "Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth". Review of Economic Studies, 58 (1): 43-61. [16] Khandelwal, A. (2010) "The Long and Short (of) Quality Ladders". Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1450-1476. [17] Lileeva, A. and Tre.er, D. (2010) "Improves Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity...for some Plants". The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (3), 1051-1099. [18] Mayer, T., Melitz M. J. and Ottaviano G. I. P. (2014) "Market Size, Competition, and the Product Mix of Exporters". American Economic Review, 104(2): 495-536. [19] Melitz, M. J. (2003) "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity". Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. [20] Melitz, M. and Ottaviano, G. (2008) "Market Size, Trade and Productivity". Review of Economic Studies, 75, 296-316. [21] PINTEC (2000) "Pesquisa Industrial de Inovação Tecnológica". Instituto Brasileiro de Geogra.a e Estatística RJ/RJ. [22] Qiu L. D. and Zhou W. (2013) "Multiproduct Firms and Scope Adjustment in Globalization". Journal of International Economics, 91, 142-153. [23] Rauch, J. E., (1999) "Networks versus Markets in International Trade". Journal of International Economics 48, 7-35. [24] Verhoogen, E. A. (2008) "Trade, Quality Upgrading, and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector". The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2), 489-530. [25] Yeaple, S. R. (2005) "A Simple Model of Firm Heterogeneity, International Trade, and Wages". Journal of International Economics, 65 (1), 1-20. |