Reutlinger, Alexander
(2013):
Can Interventionists Be Neo-Russellians? Interventionism, the Open Systems Argument, and the Arrow of Entropy.
In: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 27, No. 3: pp. 273-293
|
![[img]](https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/21241/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/Reutlinger_Can_interventionists_be_neo-Russellians_archive.pdf)  Preview |
|
- Submitted Version
302kB |
Abstract
Several proponents of the interventionist theory of causation have recently argued for a neo-Russellian account of causation. The article discusses two strategies for interventionists to be neo-Russellians. First, I argue that the open systems argument---the main argument for a neo-Russellian account advocated by interventionists---fails. Second, I explore and discuss an alternative for interventionists who wish to be neo-Russellians: the statistical--mechanical account. Although the latter account is an attractive alternative, it is argued that interventionists are not able to adopt it straightforwardly. Hence, to be neo-Russellians remains a challenge for interventionists.