Global Investment Decisions and Patent Protection: Evidence from German Multinationals

Nabokin, Tatjana (August 2014): Global Investment Decisions and Patent Protection: Evidence from German Multinationals. Münchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge (VWL) 2014-40

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of patent protection in the global investment decisions of multinational firms. Using comprehensive firm-level panel data of German multinationals, we investigate how changes in a host country’s patent protection influence the extensive and intensive margin of foreign direct investment (FDI) decisions. We isolate the effect of patent protection by estimating a difference-in-difference type approach and controlling for an extensive set of fixed effects. At the extensive margin, we find that strengthening patent protection increases the probability of locating a foreign affiliate, whereby the effect is stronger for firms that highly depend on patent protection. The effect depends further on a host country’s initial legal and economic development. Given that a parent has established a foreign affiliate, no systematic effects of patent protection are found for the decision on how much to invest in the affiliate at the intensive margin. With regard to the ownership structure, we find that multinationals take into account the risk of intellectual property infringements and increase the ownership share held in the foreign affiliate after strengthening patent protection.

• Dokumententyp: Paper
• Keywords: Intellectual property rights, patent protection, foreign direct investment, multinationals
• Fakultät: Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics
• Themengebiete: 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft
• JEL Classification: O34, F23
• Sprache: Englisch

Literaturliste

Ai, C., Norton, E., 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters 80 (1), 123–129.

Bilir, K., 2011. Patent laws, product lifecycle lengths, and the global sourcing decisions of US multinationals, University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Economics, mimeo.

Branstetter, L., Fisman, R., Foley, C., Saggi, K., 2011. Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? Journal of International Economics 83 (1), 27–36.

Branstetter, L. G., Fisman, R., Foley, C. F., 2006. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from US firm-level panel data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (1), 321–349.

Chor, D., Manova, K., 2012. Off the cliff and back? Credit conditions and international trade during the global financial crisis. Journal of International Economics 87 (1), 117 – 133.

Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., Walsh, J. P., 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why us manufacturing firms patent (or not), NBERWorking Paper No. 7552.

Falvey, R., Foster, N., Greenaway, D., 2006. Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Review of Development Economics 10 (4), 700–719.

Ferrantino, M. J., 1993. The effect of intellectual property rights on international trade and investment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129 (2), 300–331.

Ginarte, J., Park, W., 1997. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy 26 (3), 283–301.

Greene,W. E., 2008. Econometric analysis, 6th Edition. Pearson Education, New Jersey. Helpman, E., 1993. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61 (6), 1247–1280.

Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., Yeaple, S. R., 2004. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. The American Economic Review 94 (1), 300–316.

Javorcik, B. S., 2004. The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review 48 (1), 39–62.

Kesternich, I., Schnitzer, M., 2010. Who is afraid of political risk? Multinational firms and their choice of capital structure. Journal of International Economics 82 (2), 208–218.

Kumar, N., 2001. Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity of multinational enterprises: The case of US and Japanese corporations. Research Policy 30 (1), 159–174.

Lai, E. L.-C., 1998. International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation. Journal of Development Economics 55 (1), 133–153.

Lee, J.-Y., Mansfield, E., 1996. Intellectual property protection and U.S. foreign direct investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2), 181–186.

Lipponer, A., 2006. Microdatabase direct investment - MiDi. A brief guide. Manova, K., 2013. Credit constraints, heterogeneous firms, and international trade. Review of Economic Studies 80 (2), 711–744.

Maskus, K. E., 2000. Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Peterson Institute.

Maskus, K. E., Penubarti, M., 1995. How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics 39 (3-4), 227 – 248.

Melitz, M. J., 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6), 1695–1725.

Park,W., 2008. International patent protection: 1960-2005. Research Policy 37 (4), 761–766.

Qian, Y., 2007. Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978-2002. The Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (3), 436–453.

Rajan, R., Zingales, L., 1998. Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review 88 (3), 559–86.

Smith, P. J., 1999. Are weak patent rights a barrier to U.S. exports? Journal of International Economics 48 (1), 151 – 177.

UNCTAD, 2011. Trade and development report. Wooldridge, J. M., 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd Edition. MIT Press.

Yang, G., Maskus, K. E., 2001a. Intellectual property rights and licensing: An econometric investigation.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137 (1), 58–79.

Yang, G., Maskus, K. E., 2001b. Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model. Journal of International Economics 53 (1), 169–187.