Abstract
If countries anticipate Bertrand competition in tax rates, they may expend effort that makes some of their tax payers less mobile or increases the mobility of tax payers elsewhere. I provide piecemeal evidence on what activities countries use. I analyse how such activities interact with Bertrand tax competition if the size of the group of loyal and non-loyal citizens or investors is endogenous. Further I consider the implications of tax harmonization and minimum taxes for these types of non-price competition. Home attachment reduces the intensity of tax competition, but generates a strategic disadvantage for the country that invests much in such home attachment. Harmonization of taxes and high minimum taxes can intensify countries’ investment in home attachment.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | tax competition; common pool; advertizing; nation brands; instilling preferences; home bias; patriotism |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > MPI für Steuerrecht und Öffentliche Finanzen |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | F21, F22, H77 |
Ort: | München |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 24475 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 02. Apr. 2015, 13:14 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 03. Mrz. 2017, 10:54 |