Abstract
We suggest a family bargaining model where human capital investment decisions are made non-cooperatively in a first stage, while day-to-day allocation of time is determined later through Nash bargaining, but with non-cooperative behaviour as the fall back. Several authors have claimed that non-cooperative behaviour is a more appropriate fall back in family bargaining than utilities as single. We argue that the empirical implications of the two approaches are quite parallel. A second finding is that over-investment in education may be even more of a problem in our mixed cooperative-non-cooperative model than in a fully non-cooperative one.
| Dokumententyp: | Paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Education; Family Bargaining |
| Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > MPI für Steuerrecht und Öffentliche Finanzen |
| Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
| JEL Classification: | D13, J22, J24 |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Dokumenten ID: | 24489 |
| Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 07. Apr. 2015 08:27 |
| Letzte Änderungen: | 03. Mrz. 2017 10:54 |
