Abstract
We suggest a family bargaining model where human capital investment decisions are made non-cooperatively in a first stage, while day-to-day allocation of time is determined later through Nash bargaining, but with non-cooperative behaviour as the fall back. Several authors have claimed that non-cooperative behaviour is a more appropriate fall back in family bargaining than utilities as single. We argue that the empirical implications of the two approaches are quite parallel. A second finding is that over-investment in education may be even more of a problem in our mixed cooperative-non-cooperative model than in a fully non-cooperative one.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | Education; Family Bargaining |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > MPI für Steuerrecht und Öffentliche Finanzen |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | D13, J22, J24 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 24489 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 07. Apr. 2015, 08:27 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 03. Mrz. 2017, 10:54 |