Abstract
We suggest a family bargaining model where human capital investment decisions are made non-cooperatively in a first stage, while day-to-day allocation of time is determined later through Nash bargaining, but with non-cooperative behaviour as the fall back. Several authors have claimed that non-cooperative behaviour is a more appropriate fall back in family bargaining than utilities as single. We argue that the empirical implications of the two approaches are quite parallel. A second finding is that over-investment in education may be even more of a problem in our mixed cooperative-non-cooperative model than in a fully non-cooperative one.
| Item Type: | Paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Education; Family Bargaining |
| Faculties: | Economics > Chairs > MPI for Tax Law and Public Finance |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
| JEL Classification: | D13, J22, J24 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 24489 |
| Date Deposited: | 07. Apr 2015 08:27 |
| Last Modified: | 03. Mar 2017 10:54 |
