Abstract
How does a predecessor theory relate to its successor? According to Heinz Post's General Correspondence Principle, the successor theory has to account for the empirical success of its predecessor. After a critical discussion of this principle, I outline and discuss various kinds of correspondence relations that hold between successive scientific theories. I then look in some detail at a case study from contemporary physics: the various proposals for a theory of high-temperature superconductivity. The aim of this case study is to understand better the prospects and the place of a methodological principle such as the Generalized Correspondence Principle. Generalizing from the case study, I will then argue that some such principle has to be considered, at best, as one tool that might guide scientists in their theorizing. Finally I present a tentative account of why principles such as the Generalized Correspondence Principle work so often and why there is so much continuity in scientific theorizing.
Dokumententyp: | Buchbeitrag |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Postprint |
Keywords: | Theory change, correspondence principle, Bayesianism, high-temperature superconductivity |
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP)
Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Philosophy of Science Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Philosophy of Physics |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie |
ISBN: | 978-1-4020-6279-7 |
Ort: | Berlin |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 24650 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 30. Apr. 2015, 04:31 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 03. Mrz. 2017, 10:55 |