Delegating Pricing Power to Customers: Pay What You Want or Name Your Own Price?

Krämer, Florentin; Schmidt, Klaus M. ; Spann, Martin und Stich, Lucas (7. Mai 2015): Delegating Pricing Power to Customers: Pay What You Want or Name Your Own Price? Münchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge (VWL) 2015-5

Abstract

Pay What You Want (PWYW) and Name Your Own Price (NYOP) are customer-driven pricing mechanisms that give customers (some) pricing power. Both have been used in service industries with high fixed capacity costs in order to appeal to additional customers by reducing prices without setting a reference price. In this experimental study we compare the functioning and the performance of these two pricing mechanisms. We show that both mechanisms can be successfully used to endogenously price discriminate. PWYW can be very successful if there is an additional promotional benefit to using PWYW and if marginal costs are not too high. PWYW is a very aggressive competitive strategy that achieves almost full market penetration. NYOP is a less aggressive strategy that can also be used if marginal costs are high. It reduces price competition and segments the market. Low valuation customers are more likely to use NYOP while high valuation customers prefer a posted price seller.

• Dokumententyp: Paper
• Keywords: Customer-driven pricing mechanisms; Pay What You Want; Name Your Own Price; Competitive Strategies; Marketing; Laboratory Experiment.
• Fakultät: Betriebswirtschaft ; Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Seminar für Wirtschaftstheorie
• Themengebiete: 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft
• JEL Classification: D03, D21, D22, D40, L11, M31
• Sprache: Englisch

Literaturliste

Abbas, A. E. and Hann (2010). Measuring risk aversion in a name-your-own-price channel. Decision Analysis, 7(1):123–136.

Amaldoss, W. and Jain, S. (2008). Joint bidding in the name-your-own-price channel: A strategic analysis. Management Science, 54(10):1685–1699.

Anderson, C. K. (2009). Setting prices on priceline. Interfaces, 39(4):307–315.

Chernev, A. (2003). Reverse pricing and online price elicitation strategies in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1/2):51–62.

Ding, M., Eliashberg, J., Huber, J., and Saini, R. (2005). Emotional bidders—an analytical and experimental examination of consumers’ behavior in a priceline-like reverse auction. Management Science, 51(3):352–364.

Dolan, R. J. and Moon, Y. (2000). Pricing and market making on the internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 14(2):56–73.

Dufwenberg, M. and Gneezy, U. (2000). Price competition and market concentration: An experimental study. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(1):7–22.

Fay, S. (2004). Partial-repeat-bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Science, 23(3):407–418.

Fay, S. (2009). Competitive reasons for the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Letters, 20(3):277–293.

Fay, S. and Laran, J. (2009). Implications of expected changes in the seller’s price in name-your-own-price auctions. Management Science, 55(11):1783–1796.

Fay, S. and Lee, S. H. S. (2015). The role of customer expectations in name-your-own-price markets. Journal of Business Research, 68(3):675–683.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2):171–178.

Gautier, P. A. and van der Klaauw, B. (2012). Selection in a field experiment with voluntary participation. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(1):63–84.

Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L. D., and Brown, A. (2010). Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science, 329(5989):325–327.

Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In Kremer, K. and Macho, V., editors, Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003, volume GWDG Bericht 63, pages 79–93. Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen.

Hann, I.-H. and Terwiesch, C. (2003). Measuring the frictional costs of online transactions: The case of a name-your-own-price channel. Management Science, 49(11):1563–1579.

Hinz, O., Hann, I.-H., and Spann, M. (2011). Price discrimination in e-commerce? An examination of dynamic pricing in name-your-own price markets. MIS Quarterly, 35(1):81–98.

Hinz, O. and Spann, M. (2008). The impact of information diffusion on bidding behavior in secret reserve price auctions. Information Systems Research, 19(3):351–368.

Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5):1644–1655.

Johnson, J. W. and Cui, A. P. (2013). To influence or not to influence: External reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing. Journal of Business Research, 66(2):275–281.

Kalyanaram, G. and Winer, R. S. (1995). Empirical generalizations from reference price research. Marketing Science, 14(3):161–169.

Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M., and Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73(1):44–58.

Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M., and Spann, M. (2010). Kish: Where customers pay as they wish. Review of Marketing Science, 8(2):Article 3.

León, F. J., Noguera, J. A., and Tena-Sánchez, J. (2012). How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in el trato. Social Science Information, 51(3):389–417.

Mak, V., Zwick, R., and Rao, A. R. (2015). “Pay what you want” as a profitable pricing strategy: Theory and experimental evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127:30–34.

Murphy, R. O., Ackermann, K. A., and Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8):771–781.

Regner, T. (2014). Social preferences? Google answers! Games and Economic Behavior, 85:188–209.

Regner, T. and Barria, J. A. (2009). Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2):395–406.

Schmidt, K. M., Spann, M., and Zeithammer, R. (2014). Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets. Management Science.3

Shapiro, D. (2011). Profitability of the name-your-own-price channel in the case of risk-averse buyers. Marketing Science, 30(2):290–304.

Smith, V. L. (1976). Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66(2):274–279.

Spann, M., Häubl, G., Skiera, B., and Bernhardt, M. (2012). Bid-elicitation interfaces and bidding behavior in retail interactive pricing. Journal of Retailing, 88(1):131–144.

Spann, M., Skiera, B., and Schäfers, B. (2004). Measuring individual frictional costs and willingness-to-pay via name-your-own-price mechanisms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(4):22–36.

Spann, M. and Tellis, G. J. (2006). Does the internet promote better consumer decisions? The case of name-your-own-price auctions. Journal of Marketing, 70(1):65–78.

Spann, M., Zeithammer, R., and Häubl, G. (2010). Optimal reverse-pricing mechanisms. Marketing Science, 29(6):1058–1070.

Terwiesch, C., Savin, S., and Hann, I.-H. (2005). Online haggling at a name-your-own-price retailer: Theory and application. Management Science, 51(3):339–351.

Wang, T., Gal-Or, E., and Chatterjee, R. (2009). The name-your-own-price channel in the travel industry: An analytical exploration. Management Science, 55(6):968–979.

Weatherford, L. R. and Bodily, S. E. (1992). A taxonomy and research overview of perishableasset revenue management: Yield management, overbooking, and pricing. Operations Research, 40(5):831–844.