Abstract
We appeal to the theory of Bayesian Networks to model different strategies for obtaining confirmation for a hypothesis from experimental test results provided by less than fully reliable instruments. In particular, we consider (i) repeated measurements of a single testable consequence of the hypothesis, (ii) measurements of multiple testable consequences of the hypothesis, (iii) theoretical support for the reliability of the instrument, and (iv) calibration procedures. We evaluate these strategies on their relative merits under idealized conditions and show some surprising repercussions on the variety-of-evidence thesis and the Duhem-Quine thesis.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Postprint |
Keywords: | Confirmation theory, Bayesian Networks, Duhem-Quine thesis,variety-of-evidence thesis |
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP)
Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Philosophy of Science |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 25365 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 29. Sep. 2015, 06:23 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 29. Sep. 2015, 06:23 |