|Haufler, Andreas; Lülfesmann, Christoph (2015): Reforming an asymmetric union: On the virtues of dual tier capital taxation. In: Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 125, No. C: pp. 116-127|
This is the latest version of this item.
The tax competition for mobile capital, in particular the reluctance of small countries to agree on measures of tax coordination, has ongoing political and economic fallouts within Europe. We analyse the effects of introducing a two tier structure of capital taxation, where the asymmetric member states of a union choose a common, federal tax rate in the first stage, and then non-cooperatively set local tax rates in the second stage. We show that this mechanism effectively reduces competition for mobile capital between the members of the union. Moreover, it distributes the gains across the heterogeneous states in a way that yields a strict Pareto improvement over a one tier system of purely local tax choices. We also discuss the effects of diverging capital endowments within the union and capital flows to third countries.
|Keywords:||Capital tax competition; Dual tier taxation; International unions;|
Economics > Chairs
Economics > Chairs > Seminar for Economic Policy
|Subjects:||300 Social sciences > 330 Economics|
|JEL Classification:||H25, H77, H87|
|Deposited On:||08. Feb 2016 08:54|
|Last Modified:||22. Feb 2016 11:02|
Available Versions of this Item
Reforming an Asymmetric Union: On the Virtues of Dual Tier Capital Taxation. (deposited 18. Jan 2013 20:48)
- Reforming an asymmetric union: On the virtues of dual tier capital taxation. (deposited 08. Feb 2016 08:54) [Currently Displayed]