This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
We study the impact of social learning on the depth of reasoning in an experimental beauty-contest game. Naive advice and observation of others' decisions as two forms of social learning trigger faster convergence to the equilibrium. We find that subjects who receive advice outperform uninformed subjects permanently, whereas subjects who observe others' past behavior before making their decision only have a temporary advantage over uninformed subjects. A series of control-treatments and simulations indicate that the latter result is due to subjects failing to make the most out of observing others.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Form of publication: | Publisher's Version |
Faculties: | Economics > Chairs > Chair of Empirical Economics |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
JEL Classification: | C70, C72, C91 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 27552 |
Date Deposited: | 26. Feb 2016, 10:57 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 13:07 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The Impact of Naïve Advice and Observational Learning in Beauty-contest Games. (deposited 06. Feb 2014, 15:28)
- Social Learning in Beauty-Contest Games. (deposited 26. Feb 2016, 10:57) [Currently Displayed]